Leased a zdx (70k MSRP ) for 317 a month 12k miles a year. Love the car as a daily. Looking to purchase it at end if prices in md 20$I’d wait till the EVs get cheaper instead
Leased a zdx (70k MSRP ) for 317 a month 12k miles a year. Love the car as a daily. Looking to purchase it at end if prices in md 20$I’d wait till the EVs get cheaper instead
I knew I was being an early adopter when we bought the Model 3 in Dec 2018. Higher price, lower tech, etc.Not saying this to be funny but I often think that we think current EVs are the end all of new modern technology.
But what I wonder is, legitimately, is what if the current EVs are equal to, lets say an iPhone 2 and in 5 years the new EVs will be the iPhone 8 and so on ... ?
I think (sometimes too much) it might make current models look obsolete or maybe better said less desirable. I have no clue but technology seems to be moving faster now. Solid State batteries on the cusp of being reality and well 9 years is a long time like, example like when we went to nickel Cadmium to Lithium ... for EVs to have universal acceptance in the USA, prices and charging conveinance need to step up. No doubt in my mind it will if EVs will ever become a majority over the coming decades.
I think you're referring to the GM electric trucks, since they come in over 9,000 lbs. Yes, they are very heavy. But even with all the weight, their energy efficiency far exceeds that of a gas truck. A Sierra EV is rated at 64 MPGe, while a 2.7l gas Sierra is rated at 17 mpg. I think the weight will come down some eventually, but it won't be a gigantic leap. The bigger improvement will be a reduction in cost for the same capability. Manufacturers are tweaking chemistries to get higher energy density, but are even more focused on trying to reduce reliance on expensive materials so they can reduce battery cost.A big item will be the amount of kWhrs per that can be stored in 1 lb of battery weight. If some advances are made, they can either start to get rid of the ridiculous weight or extend the range. The weight of the truck EV's is astounding.
Would’ve should have could haveI knew I was being an early adopter when we bought the Model 3 in Dec 2018. Higher price, lower tech, etc.
Came to love the car but I shoulda bought the stock!
View attachment 302200
Most have had production stop or have had production cut in half, with no production the quantities available will become extremely constrained and rareI’d wait till the EVs get cheaper instead
That's a way to try and keep prices up, or possibly PO people and drive them to ICE or Hybrids.Most have had production stop or have had production cut in half, with no production the quantities available will become extremely constrained and rare
Most have had production stop or have had production cut in half, with no production the quantities available will become extremely constrained and rare
You can probably beat these numbers on Leasehackr. There's some pretty sharp brokers over there. I'd at least check it out. That's where I got my lease deal on my Lightning for $299.96/mo. MSRP $65,590.With the EV credit expiring, I am thinking of reaching out to a dealer or two to see if any lease deals are available. I'm thinking 24 mos, low mileage. Bad idea? Never leased before but that's the only way I'd consider an EV.
![]()
![]()
The laws of physics limit just how many ions we can move. We will see improvements, but we won't see anything close to parity with fuel powered vehicles with regard to energy density.A big item will be the amount of kWhrs per that can be stored in 1 lb of battery weight. If some advances are made, they can either start to get rid of the ridiculous weight or extend the range. The weight of the truck EV's is astounding.
Using average grid power in the USA to charge a GMC Sierra for a 100 mile, 75mph highway driver, the powerplant will consume AT LEAST 5 gal (in BTU, energy) worth of diesel fuel or 6 gal of gasoline. Or about 16.6MPG.I think you're referring to the GM electric trucks, since they come in over 9,000 lbs. Yes, they are very heavy. But even with all the weight, their energy efficiency far exceeds that of a gas truck. A Sierra EV is rated at 64 MPGe, while a 2.7l gas Sierra is rated at 17 mpg. I think the weight will come down some eventually, but it won't be a gigantic leap. The bigger improvement will be a reduction in cost for the same capability. Manufacturers are tweaking chemistries to get higher energy density, but are even more focused on trying to reduce reliance on expensive materials so they can reduce battery cost.
Your numbers seem off.Using average grid power in the USA to charge a GMC Sierra for a 100 mile, 75mph highway driver, the powerplant will consume AT LEAST 5 gal (in BTU, energy) worth of diesel fuel or 6 gal of gasoline. Or about 16.6MPG.
It's not the weight that drives the energy consumption. It's the aerodynamic drag.There is no such thing as a free lunch. Pushing a 9,000 pound pickup truck down the highway is energy intensive, regardless of source.
Don't need to see parity in energy density. Electrification is over 90% efficient, and ICE throws away more than 60% of the energy content of the fuel.The laws of physics limit just how many ions we can move. We will see improvements, but we won't see anything close to parity with fuel powered vehicles with regard to energy density.
One needs to verify what they are getting with any vehicle.No opinion on leasing a car. But before you buy a Cadillac, you need to be aware that they are pulling the same sort of nonsense that BMW started, with charging you a monthly fee to turn on some features, particularly those such as lane keep assist, assisted lane changing and such.
I'm not saying to not buy Cadillac, but you need to go in eyes wide open.
F=m*a. Acceleration also requires energy. Getting that thing up to speed at every red light requires energy resulting in poor “ gas mileage” . I go agree that people should get used to the miles per kWh. 40 mpg is awesome. 10 mpg sucks. 2 miles per kWh sucks for an EV even though is cheaper than gas for the same vehicle. 5 miles per kwhr is common for smaller EVs.Your numbers seem off.
Using 2 miles / kWh consumption, traveling 100 miles is 50 kWh.
1 gallon = 33.7 kWh, so 50 kWh = 1.48 gallons of gas.
Not sure how you arrived at 6 gallons of gasoline.
It's not the weight that drives the energy consumption. It's the aerodynamic drag.
In local driving the vehicle can take advantage of regenerative braking. Aerodynamic drag is also far reduced. Driving at low speeds is how GM got over 1,000 miles out of single charge. So miles / kWh more than doubled by reducing speed.F=m*a. Acceleration also requires energy. Getting that thing up to speed at every red light requires energy resulting in poor “ gas mileage” . I go agree that people should get used to the miles per kWh. 40 mpg is awesome. 10 mpg sucks. 2 miles per kWh sucks for an EV even though is cheaper than gas for the same vehicle. 5 miles per kwhr is common for smaller EVs.
Numbers are right on. Try charging an EV with a 40% efficient engine diesel generator (conventional large type). A model S comes out at 26mpg or so.Your numbers seem off.
Using 2 miles / kWh consumption, traveling 100 miles is 50 kWh.
1 gallon = 33.7 kWh, so 50 kWh = 1.48 gallons of gas.
Not sure how you arrived at 6 gallons of gasoline.
It's not the weight that drives the energy consumption. It's the aerodynamic drag.
Numbers are right on. Try charging an EV with a 40% efficient engine diesel generator (conventional large type). A model S comes out at 26mpg or so.
Average US grid efficiency is 33%.
Using our very best combined cycle power plants, which can achieve 60%++ efficiency at the generators terminals (never higher than 54% at the power plant fence) we still must contend with grid losses, charger losses and the round trip battery losses (charge-discharge). In the mix but not the numbers are motor and controller losses.
The idea that the dashboard says 600 Watt hours per mile at 75mph, does not mean the power plant must produce only 600 watt hours to push the vehicle a mile. The losses add up.
Although this 30 second video is a bit snarky, it illustrates the point well.
That doesn't seem accurate. I think my Bolt insurance is less than $100/month.For this to be worthwhile, the lease payment needs to be very low. And the miles per year, at least acceptable. Even in retirement, I'm driving my beater car 12K miles per year, and my sports car 5000 miles per year.
Remember, the insurance on a beater is near nothing. Whereas the expensive insurance on an EV lease will always require $100K/300K comp and collision and at least $50K or $100K property damage. An iD4 lease of $150 per month (possible with some deals) will (around here in South Florida) have a ins premium no lower than $245/mo.