quote:
Originally posted by Rodbuckler:
Also, you are calculating the magnitude at which HP and torque in ft.-lbs are equal. I am just saying that they are unequal because one is torque and one is power.
No, I'm saying that HP is merely a function of torque. the multiplication by rpm and 1/5252 are simply scalars... and the multiplication by RPM makes it a nonlinear function of greater magnitude than previously, thus the reasons why the numbers and curves dont fall on each othr, and thus look 'unequal'.
I think that everyone can agree that in the most basic sense, torque is a function of RPM. Sure, RPM can be a function of fuel consumption, air flow, combustion characteristics, etc. But all of these can be wrapped up into an RPM figure in a way. So let's say that torque is a function of RPM.
Lets say that Torque is directly equal to RPM, thus Torque(RPM)=RPM... simply noted, f(x)=x
OK, so now, lets 'scale the function to calculate HP... we get:
y(x)=x^2/5252
or written out,
hp(rpm)=(torque(rpm)*rpm)/5252
And since torque(rpm) is arbitrarily = rpm, then simplifying we get:
hp(rpm)=rpm^2/5252
See below, the torque "curve" is linear... the HP courve is scaled by the variable RPM, so it is no onger linear... however, devide by the scalar x/5252, and you retrace the torque figure at all points. Thus hp is merely torque multiplied by a nonlinear scalar, and are in fact saying the same thing.