Differences in Helicoil taps?

JHZR2

Staff member
Joined
Dec 14, 2002
Messages
56,117
Location
New Jersey
This thread is related to frustration and issues with my Mercedes exhaust manifold project, but is another that I think will be universally useful.

Let’s get one thing straight upfront. When doing helicoils, you drill a hole and use an STI (Screw Thread Interface) tap. That tap isn’t the same size as a regular tap for the thread you’re cutting. It’s bigger to account for the insert. So, for example an M8x1.25 STI will be larger, around 10mm. It does not cut the standard thread and diameter.

On the aforementioned Mercedes project, which is documented on this site, I had multiple issues.

1) Helicoil branded Chinese coo tap wouldn’t start so couldn’t cut threads
2) Helicoil branded USA coo bottoming tap from reputable source wouldn’t cut threads that were made with another M8x1.25 STI tap that is known to be correct to allow Helicoil installation.

#1 may be as ridiculous as a metric/imperial misalignment. The M8x1.25 STI taps say to drill with a 21/64” bit. 21/64=0.328”. 0.328x25.4=8.331mm.

But some tables Say that for iron/steel, to drill with an 8.4mm bit! Only use 8.3 for aluminum or soft metals.

So is that it for #1? I needed to drill 8.4mm instead of 21/64?

IMG_8461.webp


IMG_8462.webp


I don’t know that it’s all of the story because a different Chinese tap with more of a taper started immediately and cut perfectly.


Ok, now the really interesting one, #2.

After the Chinese Helicoil tap wouldn’t start and did not work whatsoever, my wife went to AAP, and got their brand. Helicoil had a pointy Chinese tap and coils made in USA. The AAP kit had a tap with more of a taper, and coils made in “AU” (Austria? Australia?), with the (IMO nicer and better) Chinese tap cutting easily and well.


IMG_8478.webp


So here’s the confusion with #2 and why it took so long with the story. One of the holes is blind. Not a ton of depth. It will be holding a turbo on to the manifold. So I wanted an ideal repair at ideal blind depth to take the helicoil a bit below the surface.

Imagine my surprise when the bottoming tap to cut the final threads would not thread in. When I tried it wouldn’t go. When I looked at the threads, the properly labeled tap looked different in pitch. But why? Aren’t these things universal?

Here’s the case in point. Top one is Chinese Helicoil branded that would not start under any case. Middle is US made Helicoil branded bottoming tap. Bottom is the Chinese AAP store branded tap.

IMG_8530.webp


Here are the threads of the two kit taps:

IMG_8535.webp

I’d say more or less even.

Here’s the Helicoil bottoming (right) vs a regular plug chamfer (left) that I used to cut the threads I this project:

IMG_8536.webp

Note the thread pitch doesn’t line up!

Thread gauge shows similar. Tap I cut the threads with:
IMG_8537.webp


New helicoil bottoming tap in same M8x1.25 STI

IMG_8538.webp

Way off and similarly not working at 1.00 pitch. Yet the plug chamfer M6x1.0 helicoill branded that fit the 1.0 gauge perfect.

Could my actual Helicoil tap also be wrong?

I don’t know. The helicoils seem to mate the threads with the bottoming tap fine.

IMG_8531.webp


Perhaps easier/better than the kits:

IMG_8533.webp


So what’s right or wrong? I don’t dare put that bottoming tap into the blind hole because if I ruin the threads I’m done for.

I’m tempted to buy a US-made helicoil branded basic plug chamfer tap to verify how much difference there is.

But seriously, what gives? Why is Helicoil giving the bottoming tap an oddball and different pitch than anything, and causing a big issue with interchangeability? Who is right and wrong here? What lessons can we learn?

Is Helicoil and parent Stanley screwing up both the US and Chinese taps?
 
Last edited:
I've never tried to source plug or bottoming taps in STI, so I'm not sure.

I'm trying to work out in my feeble brain: if a manufacturer chooses to use a different diameter wire for the insert, diameter of the hole and thread pitch of the tap could be different. This is all I can think of.
 
I really have no idea what the issues are with these but I think it may have something to do with the tolerance of the taps eg most STI taps are 4H5H fit but there may be different ones depending of manufacturer and COO, what is confusing me is the difference in thread pitch.
The V coil set I have uses an 8.3 drill bit. I would post this on a machinist forum and ask Helicoil.

https://guhring.com/media/support/Tapping-Tolerances-And-Approximate-Limits.pdf
https://voelkel.com/en/blog/thread-...-differences-applications-and-recommendations
 
  • Like
Reactions: D60
They have to be the same pitch as the specified bolt. Otherwise it is just plain wrong. The Helicoil forces the same pitch inside and outside. Diameter isn't nearly as important.

On iron parts another approach is to weld up the hole then drill and tap the weld metal to the original size.
 
  • Like
Reactions: D60
It wouldn't matter if Helicoil brand or a knock-off, any coiled insert works the same way. The coils lay in the outer thread, which sets the pitch of the inner thread.
 
That's a bummer. Don't know if you want to sacrifice the starting tap but I've had to make a bottoming tap out of starting taps before via bench grinder i suppose a 4 1/2 hand grinder would also work just don't get it to hot.... dip in water frequently when doing so. It does take a little time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: D60
Sure. He knows this, but we are talking about helical insert (Helicoil brand) specialized thread.

Something is goofy for sure.
I suggested pitch could change with wire diameter, but I agree this isn't true. Diameter of the hole could change, though -- IF manufacturers use varying diameters (I don't know)

It'd be the same as using wire gauges to measure thread depth, essentially.
 
Back
Top Bottom