acewiza, I'm not trying to deceive you, I'm letting on to what I've found to be the case in my research, training and experience. What I described above is what I have observed by building many gas and diesel engines of many sizes. It is also taken from the countless classes I've attended and continual reading of new literature that is sent to me from the industry. Sealed Power had a very good publication around 1995 or so that reiterated much of what I said above pertaining to gas engines and their cylinder rings and the cylinder walls.
I have yet to see proof that an engine has lasted longer on FP, MMO or any other GAS additive other than a lead substitute. I will agree that many engines run better with MMO, FP, etc. However, as I stated above that is due to the solvency of the additive and it's tendency to solubilize (mostly) carbon deposits in the fuel system and somewhat on the piston crowns and valve faces. An engine that has deposits on the ring lands and thus stuck rings, as far as I have seen, may be saved by an oil additive but the fuel additive does nothing for them. If the fuel was in contact with the cylinder walls and piston long enough for any fuel additive to make a difference it would free the stuck rings as well as an oil additive.
I had two 2.3L Rangers at work that were very high mileage with extended oil drains with dino oil. They both failed not only the compression test but the leak-down test as well. After seeing what the top of the head looked like after the valve cover was pulled on the two engines I thought they would be good test mules. I ran a plethora of fuel additives and oil additives. None of the fuel additives made any measurable difference. Each fuel additive was run for one OCI and then the vehicles were evaluated again. I then tried several different solvent oil flushes, which did make some difference, although not enough to save the engines and I just yarded them out and went through them. If you are interested I can write up what we did, but I'm not going to right now, it would be a very long read.
The top end "lube" as far as modern gas engines go is as much of a myth as the Pennzoil sludge problems and the 3,000 mile OCI. A diesel engine needs lube in the fuel, but not for ring or valve lubrication.
I just finished a week long class at Cummins that dealt for several days just on lubrication and fuel lubricity was brought up as well. The engineers giving that class did not seem to think the fuel was affecting ring/cylinder/valve wear due to lubricty values.
I most certainly could be wrong, however all the training I've been to along with what I have seen in the field makes me believe I am for the most part accurate. I'm certainly no chemist either. What I stated above is what I have seen at the fleet level and at home with the various vintages (currently still running one A and one B model 4 cyl Ford engine as the oldest still in service at home) engines. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree as the saying goes.