Walmart sells a diesel additive called Power Service. Can anyone tell me if this will be OK to run in a Duramax. They have three different types. They also stock a Shell brand.
quote:
Originally posted by Ken2:
Jamn
You do not need a fuel additive. If you use one, be sure to buy one where either the label or the MSDS does not list alcohol.
Ken
The ones of 10-20 years ago... a few years back due to EPA regs the stuff was changed and now it is going to be kicked into high gear... they already have companies in Tex. shipping to Fla. and often times the fuel is in poor shape here and by the time it gets there about 3-4 weeks later into the pumpstations, it has already degraded to below that of a passable fuel...quote:
Originally posted by drewmandrews:
As opposed to gasoline, doesn't diesel fuel inheriently contain a certain amount of lubricating properties and for the lack of a better term, wax, that helps in lubrication of cylinder walls especially ? At least that's whay I've been led to believe.
Drew
Yup, but there are other natural problems with the low sulfer than just lube... it helps in the aid of absorbing and hiding water-- always a good thing, right? anyway this will then aid more microbes --- so think of hot areas like Texas that say like Houston, have a problem with the moisture already... whew, even more so.quote:
Originally posted by Steve S:
The lower sulfer stuff and the winter blends are lower in lubricating .
Originally posted by Ken2:
[QB]-*-*
Thanks for the link... I've seen most of this before, but I'll try to review it...
The link to the fuel data, is kinda JUST passable.
The thing is what happens if it STARTS degrading, and the new fuel will do so in I believe 3-6 months, some that are marginal to begin with in weeks or days.
Hey, think what you want. I'm just the messenger.
I know also of some testing that shows that this fuel COULD destroy a fuel pump in a single TANK, and remember, the new numbers they will work with are not these here listed on the data sheet, there lower. My main point is the new Viscosity levels of D975 are ONLY ADEQUATE... kinda like using 99 cent oil or perhaps say 1.29 oil, when an 1.89 oil will do them in most cases a whole lot better. Hey, I think I can see a little from your point.
My thing is that YEAh, sure, thers a bunch of crud on the market, but there are also a bunch of REAL answers to these real problems that will cost a lot of people real money and downtime... everyone owes it to their own interest to investigate the matter fully, and come to their own conclusions.
Lubricity, High Frequency Reciprocating Rig
(HFRR), mm@60°C D 6079 0.45
-- A score of .46 or less is passable, and the test I know about in the field is the military SLBOCLE of a 3100g, but they are comparable.
Also:
Sulfur, ppm D 5453 30
well the limits by 2006 are 15ppm or LESS.
They will probably have to make it almost ZERO in order to meet government specs.
-*-* If necessary, the refinery may add a lubricity additive to the fuel. There are two different tests for fuel lubricity, -*-*
Yeah, look above. The ASTM as far as I'm aware of has not currently made lubricity as part of the D975 specification... the committee on petroleum production and lubes is working to update the specs... I mentioned some of this in another post awhile ago... the thing is: even if they resolve this issue per se, and I could be wrong because I'm no chemist, but they still have the extra pollution or contaminates rather that will be depostied into the oil as a result of the new fuel... and the oil will suffer more and anyway my view is treat the source the best you can.
RobbieAlexander,
I feel that certain additives added by the consumer may be a benefit, but none are needed.
-- I know you do. But they are needed... minimum specs just don't cut it... not in the long run.
And, certain additives are a waste of money or do damage.
--
Agreed... Thats why you should start to do research.
Very long term there may be a benefit. Short term there may be an economy benefit. Lots of folks run many, many miles reliably with pump fuel.
--
correct, long term sure, most will see short term too because of better MPG and cleaner engines, etc. and yes they MAY go a long time between failures, but thers tests that show that a bad tank can also kill it just as well.
Here's lots of good fuel info--both have sections on the additives added at the refinery:
-*-*-*-thanks.
WHy -- you dhould do a test... a freezer test...quote:
Originally posted by Bror Jace:
-*-*
So, I'm using Power Service (white bottle) with (hopefully) fresh fuel. Am considering using it at double strength (recommended for certain conditions) to maximize low-temp operation. The vehicle is NOT being kept in a heated space, unfortunately.![]()
--- Bror Jace
I have tried Stanadyne and Amsoils additive as well as Power Service. I have settled on Amsoil for my powerstroke. Amsoil was the only one to quiet down the #8 injector noise. Don't know why, maybe coincidence.quote:
Originally posted by Ken2:
Power Service is one of the better brands of fuel additive. Nationally, amoung independent additive suppliers, Power Service is #2 and Schaeffer is #3 (and I've heard that they're soon to trade places). #1?...memory fails.
Ken
quote:
Originally posted by wulimaster:
-*-*-* Amsoil was the only one to quiet down the #8 injector noise. Don't know why, maybe coincidence.Maybe because of lubricity of the additive... the fuel is the lubricant... better lube~=~ less friction