double post
Last edited:
Dealers can absolutely order them, they usually won’t unless you put a significant deposit up front because they don’t want to be stuck with a car nobody wants because it’s completely stripped down. My Ram sat on the lot for ~4 months because it’s a Tradesman with a whopping 3 options (5.7 hemi, chrome plus, limited slip diff). The only thing I wish I had was a heated steering wheel. Not a spec a lot of people want because they want the center console, heated leather seats, remote start etc etc. The average American doesn’t want an absolutely stripped out base model despite you trying to claim otherwise.You can't buy what the manufacturers refuse to sell. Oh and some of them are cagey, they'll put them up on their websites but it is impossible to order them because the dealers claim they cannot. On various car websites for different makes I see many threads about the inability to buy basic models, even by special ordering them, while they are listed on the websites by the mfrs.
You're learning, you didn't attach the ..theory" part of the phrase.It’s a conspiracy!!![]()
To some degree this is true, but my real gripe is the EXCESSIVENESS of relying on complex technology and the expense involved,Doesn't matter, stripped or loaded. Basest of base is going to have lots of chips. ABS wheel sensors? That's an IC per wheel. Crank and cam sensors? IC's. Transmission control unit? engine control unit? ABS control unit? lots of IC's in them. The lists goes on and on. I bet the windshield wipers and heck maybe even the horn all have IC's in them.
[Seatbelts latches these days have sensors in them too--that's an IC right there, just to detect if the buckle is inserted or not.]
IC's aren't the only problem. Passive components (resistors and capacitors) are big problem. I'm sure diodes and transistors are too.
Sure they COULD order them, but many stores FLAT OUT REFUSE, since the mfrs don' require them to listen to customer requests,Dealers can absolutely order them, they usually won’t unless you put a significant deposit up front because they don’t want to be stuck with a car nobody wants because it’s completely stripped down. My Ram sat on the lot for ~4 months because it’s a Tradesman with a whopping 3 options (5.7 hemi, chrome plus, limited slip diff). The only thing I wish I had was a heated steering wheel. Not a spec a lot of people want because they want the center console, heated leather seats, remote start etc etc. The average American doesn’t want an absolutely stripped out base model despite you trying to claim otherwise.
Until a tornado touches down in the area.I’m waiting for the chip shortage to be over since Ford has a ton of F350s sitting in Ky. Then try to score a good deal on a 7.3 gasser.
Luckily we are really past tornado season for the most part.Until a tornado touches down in the area.
Because they do not want to be stuck with an unwanted by everybody except 1% of the population vehicle.Sure they COULD order them, but many stores FLAT OUT REFUSE, since the mfrs don' require them to listen to customer requests,
I've actually offered in the past to put down sizable deposits at a number of stores and they still refused, and I've heard similar stories from other
consumers too.
Then I could get a big discountUntil a tornado touches down in the area.
Because they do not want to be stuck with an unwanted by everybody except 1% of the population vehicle.
If they weren't financing with borrowed money and paying interest they most definitely would be. It's the same thing thing causes housing bubbles and recessions. Poisonous systemPeople don't want stripped down cars or starter houses.
If they weren't financing with borrowed money and paying interest they most definitely would be. It's the same thing thing causes housing bubbles and recessions. Poisonous system
Again people are "choosing" excesses and living beyond their means because of monetary manipulation. That's a fact.That's pure folly. Desire doesn't change just because affordability does. Jim working at Walmart might not be able to afford the loaded version, but that doesn't mean he didn't want it.
I would absolutely love to live on a 2,000 acre plot with zero neighbours and a 10,000 square foot shop, but that's not in the budget.
The people that legitimately desire having the most decontented products possible absolutely make up the extreme minority of the buying public. Clearly, you are part of that group, but projecting that onto the majority is beyond silly. OEM's cater to what the market wants, this is gleaned from historic sales data on what people buy. They don't stock cars with no options because nobody buys them, not because there's some grand conspiracy to bury luddites in dumbfounding complexity.
There's no "again", that's not what you stated, you stated:Again people are "choosing" excesses and living beyond their means because of monetary manipulation. That's a fact.
Greed isn't a "grand conspiracy", it's a fact of life.
Snowflake White said:if you asked most people what they really wanted in a car, many would tell you LESS complication, and higher build quality and durability.
It's clear that the subjects I spoke of are definitely related, and you know this. But in any case there are enough people wanting lower priced trim levels and features that it begs the question why the mfrs aren't willing to offer them. One of the major reasons is they force higher profit margin units on customers, essentially they have no choice if they want a new car. People are buying more than they can actually purchase because of financing, if the loans weren't there people would be buying less content in their cars.There's no "again", that's not what you stated, you stated:
You have now shifted your tune from people wanting rolling traps of decontentment to people choosing excess because of trickery on the financial side of things.
Those are not similar or even compatible positions.
Either people want strippermobiles (your original premise, which nobody has agreed with)
OR
People want lots of options, but they also want the cheapest possible price/"best deal" (my original premise here, running counter to your original claim).
You now appear to be ceding the latter in fact being the case, but that this is the result of the ability for people to borrow more than they perhaps should be able to in order to obtain these products.
It would be really helpful if you could stick to a theory, rather than you know, shuffling about like a dog on a greased floor and then tossing out "again" like we've already had this dance when in reality, that was a wholly different position from the one you are now claiming to have taken.
It's clear that the subjects I spoke of are definitely related, and you know this. But in any case there are enough people wanting lower priced trim levels and features that it begs the question why the mfrs aren't willing to offer them. One of the major reasons is they force higher profit margin units on customers, essentially they have no choice if they want a new car. People are buying more than they can actually purchase because of financing, if the loans weren't there people would be buying less content in their cars.
They aren't. Let me try and break this down further.It's clear that the subjects I spoke of are definitely related, and you know this.
This is your contention but you've got no evidence to back it. Nobody in this thread has agreed with it either. I expect you are one of these extremely rare people and think it is more common than it actually is. If people were ordering strippers in volume, the dealers would stock them. They don't stock them, because they can't sell them, and they don't want to be stuck with inventory they can't sell.But in any case there are enough people wanting lower priced trim levels and features that it begs the question why the mfrs aren't willing to offer them.
Nobody is being forced, dealers are quite willing to order unique configurations if the person is willing to put down the money for it. The reality is that people want the nicer trimmed vehicles and the dealerships know this as do the OEM's so the system is configured with long borrowing periods, incentives and low interest rates to allow people to get into the vehicle they want, even though it may, in reality, be more than they should be spending.One of the major reasons is they force higher profit margin units on customers, essentially they have no choice if they want a new car.
Yes, but that wouldn't be because they WANTED those vehicles, they'd be forced into vehicles they don't actually WANT and have to buy what they can AFFORD, which brings us back to the two bullet points I made at the beginning of this post.People are buying more than they can actually purchase because of financing, if the loans weren't there people would be buying less content in their cars.