That's the FL820Isn't this the one people here hate on?
I have 3 Fords that take the 820S and I don't hesitate to use them. 2 of them have 150K+ on themSo what is it about the 820S?
How does one filter of a respected product line end up with cheaper construction?
My Ranger (4.0l SOHC) takes the 820S. I use WIX or FU (Fram Ultra).
That's fine. My "serious question" is about the singling out of one filter.I have 3 Fords that take the 820S and I don't hesitate to use them. 2 of them have 150K+ on them
So what is it about the 820S?
Thank you for the C&P , one of my favorite oil filters , looks good![]()
It's the larger diameter of the filter deeper poorly spaced pleats are more likely to tear.So what is it about the 820S?
How does one filter of a respected product line end up with cheaper construction?
My Ranger (4.0l SOHC) takes the 820S. I use WIX or FU (Fram Ultra).
Design and manufacturing quality are two separate things. You can have a perfect design, but if that design can't be made to specs then it can become garbage. The filters that tear media have big wide pleat spacing, so if filter model A is made on one manufacturing line, and filter model B made on another line, it's possible that one line makes the filters with crummy pleat spacing while the other makes filters with perfect pleat spacing. That's a manufacturing QA issue, because the "design" goal is to make them with good pleat spacing.That's fine. My "serious question" is about the singling out of one filter.
How can that happen (repeated bad 820S as evidenced by C&Ps here) if not by design?