Cub Cadet

Status
Not open for further replies.
Johnny, I've owned a late model 2544 which I gave to my father-in-law and currently own a Z-Force 44. Cub is nice because of their decent dealer (parts) availability and they are pretty decent for the price. I have not owned a 1000 series Cub like the one you are asking about, but I have participated in Cub OPE forums for years that talks about them. IMO, the only drawback to that 1040 is the CVT transmission. It's a belt and variator pulley drive system. I have not had good experiences with them in the past. The sliding center sheave on the variator pulley always seizes up over time and you wind up with one ground speed. I know it's more money, but I'd bump up to the 1042 or 1046, for a better transaxle.

Joel
 
Last edited:
My late father owned several Cub Cadet garden tractors before the company was bought by MTD- and he always had good luck with them. I bought a Cub Cadet Commercial Enforcer 54 in 2007 and aside from one problem(which was addressed by a TSB) it's been flawless. Oh yeah, it did need a new battery this year...
It's essentially the same mower as the current Commercial Z Force 54. I've come to the conclusion that, like home HVAC systems, the quality of the shop that sells and services them is equally -if not more- important than the quality of the equipment itself.
 
Originally Posted By: MCompact
I bought a Cub Cadet Commercial Enforcer 54 in 2007 and aside from one problem(which was addressed by a TSB) it's been flawless. Oh yeah, it did need a new battery this year...
It's essentially the same mower as the current Commercial Z Force 54.


I am digging my Z-Force and it's been flawless in the few months and ~17hrs of mow-time I've put it through, but there are some aspects of my Cub 2544 that I still miss!!

Joel
 
I am in negotiations with the dealer on a new LTX 1042 that has the hydrostatic transmission. We will see how much he budges.

I am also looking at a new Snapper rear engine riding mower. Decisions, decisions.
 
i have a 2009 ltx 1050 cub and i love it nothing but good things to say about it in the 90 hrs ive used it
 
I also looked at the LTX 1046 which a good friend of mine has and the LTX 1050 but both of these are a little larger than I need. My yard is not that big, it is just the older I get the harder it is to walk while mowing. Lets just say I have a bad leg. One of the reasons I was also looking at the rear engine Snapper, its size.
 
Johnny, the durability of the Snapper cannot be denied, but after having owned two I can tell you that the biggest negative is that they offer little in the way of rider comfort. They ride hard, transmit LOTS of vibration and noise to the rider. At anything above the slowest speeds the smallish front tires tend to plow in turns. If you want a more pleasant experience comfort-wise while mowing, I'd recommend you stick with a front-engine machine. Buying from a dealer who will let you drive around the parking lot for a while is a good idea.
 
I'm not sure which Cub Cadet model has it, but also stay away from the model with the cutting deck with the timed blades. Their have been complaints about them also.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: motorcity
On a Cub Cadet Forum I go on , their have been a few complaints about the CVT trans. I'd stay away.


Amen, I had replaced the belts of a few MTD's with this setup...what also happens is the variable pulley freezes and your stuck with either a large repair bill or a one speed tractor.
 
Originally Posted By: motorcity
I'm not sure which Cub Cadet model has it, but also stay away from the model with the cutting deck with the timed blades. Their have been complaints about them also.


I will have to research this as I thought all of the 1000 series had the timed blades. I could see where that might be a problem if they ever got out of time.
 
As fas as I know, none of the current Cub 1000 series line-up has a timed deck. I do know that some previous generation 1000's with the twin blade 42 or 46" (not sure which) had a timed deck. Have seen problems reported with those. Only when 'stationary' objects were hit though.

Joel
 
That is confusing wording, but that overlap does not involve blade interference. One blade is set further forward than the other to acheive full coverage.

Joel
 
I have pulled the blades and hepled replace belts on my Dad's '04 (IIRC) vintage LT1018 and the blade overlap there was just a slight height difference. No timing was neccessary.

I believe it is similar to the current 1042 but B&S powered. The tractor itself has only needed a tensioner spring since new.

The B&S needed a HG replacement (not uncommon due to poor headbolt pattern) but that wouldn't apply to a Kohler powered one.
 
Not sure if I am on the same track as what you are looking for but my experience has been with a Series LT1018 bought new in 2003. We live on 12 acres, the big stuff gets the Kubota and brushhog but we have about an acre or so within a low fence around the house to keep pets and kids (somewhat) corralled.

The tractor is kept inside and gets complete maintenance (oil/filters/lube/etc) every season, no exceptions. This comes out to service about every 30 hrs or so. It has had an easy life.

Like:
- hydro transmission, no problems at all, very convenient to not have shift linkage for direction/speed.
- B&S 18.5 hp engine, pressure lubed. Has run very well, I use Pennzoil Platinum 10w30 in it. It is fueled via vacuum operated fuel pump that has worked fine. I have had an issue with the routing of the spark plug wire - it eventually chafed and caused a no-start, but was easily remedied. I do think that they could have done a better job protecting the wire.
- seating position is more like a driving position, on other mowers it seemed like I was hunched over the wheel and I'm not that tall.
- plastic and paint seems to have held up well.
- cast iron front axle has been good.
- since the engine has a fuel pump, the carb does not need a diaphragm style of gasket to pump fuel. It's set up like an "older" style with float bowl, inlet needle, etc. Should not need maintenance that often, especially since the system has a fuel filter too.

Dislike:
- electrical system. Have had problems with the starter solenoid over the last year or so. Despite replacement of solenoid, starter, and battery it still gets an occasional hard start situation. Personally I think that the wire sizing is adequate but just barely.
- dash mounted "info center" has never worked properly. I didn't really care since I thought it was kind of gimmicky anyway.
- steering. the steering shaft has a gear on the end of it that meshes with a toothed sector plate that in turn moves the tierods. The steering gear wears out after several years and makes for very loose steering. Not an expensive part, but a pain to replace.

In general, for the money it's been ok but I consider it a 5-6 year machine before things start wearing out. My opinion is that this is due to cost cutting measures when selecting materials. I am on the 3rd set of drive pulleys due to the center bearing burning up. The bearing is not replaceable unless you do some mods to the pulley. Belts and blades have been ok, as mentioned blade overlap is in height only.
I work on all of my stuff so I have gotten familiar with how to work on this but for a person that may need to take it in, I think it may start costing you significant dollars at that 5 year mark. However, at the time of purchase I had compared this range of tractor based on a limited budget and thought that the Cub had more features than similar models. I think that they are all MTD/Troybuilt/Cadet now anyway.

If I was looking again tomorrow I would probably go with a higher-end Deere or Kubota model I think, but then again I have not researched things lately.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom