'Competition' with China is Killing U.S.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote:


story.kim.potrait.afp.gi.jpg





Hahahahaha.;.the little pervert really needs a good haircut.
laugh.gif
 
Quote:


Gary, you got it the other way round. We don't support the other nations. It's them who finance our lifestyles. We consume more than we can pay for, even when you consider that we get our stuff for dirt cheap from overseas. So we borrow from other nations to finance our consumption. We could stop borrowing but that would mean us not being as prosperous as we are now.





Not quite. OUR DEBT finances this continued false lifestyle. The prices are artificially low ..inducing more consumption. If this was not allowed ..there would be an immediate halt to much that is imported. People that needed products would have to produce them ..admittedly at greater expense ..however when you account for the debt and the hidden debt service ..it's not as cheap as it is made to appear.

This is all done to "give them a purpose". All trade is brokered.

It's like buying a plasma tv at BestBuy at a whopping $300 discount ..but buying it with a 24% interest rate credit card...except you don't know it ......yet.


Quote:


Imagine for a moment not being able to afford A/C in our homes, driving cars without the luxurious options such as automatic transmission or electric windows. Imagine not being able to afford to dine out. Working your a$$ off to be able to afford to put a piece of bread in front of your kids. And it goes on and on.




Imagine a time when those luxuries didn't exist. Imagine that they will return to being just as out of reach?

..and who pays this debt service? It's not like you're told that there's a hidden tarrif on the product that you buy.

We were never able to truly afford our own domestically produced consumerism.

The same principle applies regardless of debt or otherwise. The market needs to be able to support the demand. If that cannot be done wihtout financing ...then it doesn't deserve to be in existance.

Only a fool would finance a 1 or 2 year economy with 30 year money. If you ran your household like we do the nation ..you would be a fool not deserving of the products that you are allowed to buy. You would be a failure in any and all accounts ..just the point of realization may be different.

Anyone who has any defensible position for this obviously has no fundamental grasp of "it all adds up" ..or, more likely, never has to truly pay for it. Now you can rationalize or intellectualize the "need" or the "it's too late now" aspects of it in terms of some global ideolical fostering philosophy ..but in just plain $$$ and cents ..it's a train wreck looking for a place to happen. It's a race that you hope you reach some finish line before you run out of steam.

It's a situation that has a KNOWN unfavorable outcome for citizens of this nation ..and some citizens of this nation, not only accept, but push the throttle faster alledging that it is "good".

Good for whom?

Quote:


Imagine our lakes and rivers polluted because we did not export the pollution to other countries. Or not being able to breathe the air.




So, we decided that we didn't want to wipe our own behinds? So we export our filth instead of dealing with it in an appropriate manner? So we can then sell cleanup technologies to other nations as they suffer from the effects of being enslaved to our $$?

Sounds socially responsible to me
dunno.gif
Let the mud people do it.


Quote:


We are privilaged and those who complain about it need to re-examine the way they look at the things. We definitely are not the victims but the ones who benefit from the way the things are.




With all due respect ..and a big
grin.gif
on my face ..you have to have a fairly lofty perch to even have an attitude like that. I'd say that you never have to fear a layoff or a plant closure ..maybe you'll fret over making only an honest 11% instead of the more speculative 18%.

You are in a minority ..as much as you may think that you have plenty of company.

I love the confirmed "trickle down" economists. There's always a way to rationalize elitism (still a big smile on my face).

Someone once said: If you're going to run an aristocracy ..make sure you have better prep schools.
 
Quote:



I love the confirmed "trickle down" economists. There's always a way to rationalize elitism (still a big smile on my face).




The concept of "trickle down" has been around for a long time. Hundreds of years ago Indian priests in northern Mexico used a lot of peyote, enough that it was possible to get high by drinking their urine. So if you weren't a priest or other high muckie-muck in the tribe, you could take advantage of trickle down if you had the right connections.
 
What's the average life expectancy of a nation after it adopts paper money? The US stopped pegging their paper to a commodity in the 70's. I wonder how long it will be until the temptation to raid the coffers becomes totally irresistable. Let's see if the price of gold ever comes back down to $350/oz.
 
I wonder what the life expectancy in Sudan is these days?
We have a lot of nerve to sit here and whine. Materialistic pigs.
Now excuse me, I have to go get a $3 cup of coffee.
 
Quote:


I wonder what the life expectancy in Sudan is these days?
We have a lot of nerve to sit here and whine. Materialistic pigs.




What, I should feel guilty because I live in a country with a higher standard of living than a Third World nation? Give me a break.
 
China is where Japan was in the 50's. They will grow the economy till the cost of living rises to our level.
I use toys as an example

They were made cheap in these places first
Japan
Korea
Hong Kong
Taiwan
And now China

All of these place good standard of living but don't manufacture much anymore because the wages are higher.

i ahev freinds that are very knowledgable in foreign markets

They tell me that manufacturers are looking at other places other than China now.Places like Veitnam,Burma,Malaysia etc.

China can only substain if there is control of enviromental concerns.They just dump the byproducts manufature into the water and land.
Also there must be rule of law. Doing buisness in China is not fair for to get things done one must "grease" the right palms.and try to sue a person/buisness in China. Good luck if you don't have the connections.
 
As long as Communist China is willing to trade as an equal partner and willing to maintain geo/political stability we should welcome them. But, I'm not for sure this is the case.
 
Gee, I can't figure out why it seems the whole rest of the world hates us. There is not a trace of arrogance to be found (not).

A lot of people in BITOG need to take a trip outside their own country to get an appreciation about what I'm talking about.
 
Perusing the posts I see lots of social commentary, economic theory, etc.

But, I am hard-pressed to declare I see much in the way of politics, nary a trace of religious dogma and....sniff.... definitely no sex. Sniff.

So, please don't close an interesting thread with many good viewpoints.

Just remember y'all, the topic is sooooooo complex we can barely scratch the proverbial surface so please do not take offence if somebody rebuts, disagrees or burps at yah'.

There is likely at least a modicum of truth in each posting and, depending upon one's position in society, the "truth" is variable.

Thank you.

/Obbop has left the building
 
"Gee, I can't figure out why it seems the whole rest of the world hates us."

I can't think of a person I dislike from Baltimore, MD.
 
Quote:


Gee, I can't figure out why it seems the whole rest of the world hates us. There is not a trace of arrogance to be found (not).




You say that like the rest of the world hating us should matter. I for one couldn't care less what the rest of the world thinks of the US.

Quote:


A lot of people in BITOG need to take a trip outside their own country to get an appreciation about what I'm talking about.




I've been outside the US plenty of times. I have a great appreciation for the US.
 
Quote:


China is where Japan was in the 50's. They will grow the economy till the cost of living rises to our level.





That's fine with all the aforementioned nations. They were all developed at a much wealthier time in our history. When Japan made their biggest gains were when we became the biggest debtor nation on the planet (I recall the news item). It was around the same time when an already existing steel company used a loophole in a tax incentive program for domestic business to buy an oil company (naturally, it too was already existing - you've got to marvel at the genius of it).

Japan, at 100% capacity of the time, only had 1/5th of our energy demand. They also, currently, only have approx 130M people ..try raising the standard of living for (between India and China) 2.4 BILLION people. Do you remember the "technical correction" that just Japan required in our social and economic realignment?

Essentially 300M have to elevate 2.5B. Quite a bit of a difference.
 
China's standard of living has risen much these few years.they enjoy so much not even imaginable 30 years ago. I think the downfall will be a lack of a middle class.
 
Quote:


Perusing the posts I see lots of social commentary, economic theory, etc.

But, I am hard-pressed to declare I see much in the way of politics, nary a trace of religious dogma and....sniff.... definitely no sex. Sniff.

So, please don't close an interesting thread with many good viewpoints.




Yup, so far no politics. Lot's of baloney, but no politics.
grin.gif


fruit.gif
 
Quote:


Quote:


Perusing the posts I see lots of social commentary, economic theory, etc.

But, I am hard-pressed to declare I see much in the way of politics, nary a trace of religious dogma and....sniff.... definitely no sex. Sniff.

So, please don't close an interesting thread with many good viewpoints.




Yup, so far no politics. Lot's of baloney, but no politics.
grin.gif


fruit.gif





Well, please, give us the real meat here, G-Man. I like tertiary views.
wink.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom