Quote:
Gary, you got it the other way round. We don't support the other nations. It's them who finance our lifestyles. We consume more than we can pay for, even when you consider that we get our stuff for dirt cheap from overseas. So we borrow from other nations to finance our consumption. We could stop borrowing but that would mean us not being as prosperous as we are now.
Not quite. OUR DEBT finances this continued false lifestyle. The prices are artificially low ..inducing more consumption. If this was not allowed ..there would be an immediate halt to much that is imported. People that needed products would have to produce them ..admittedly at greater expense ..however when you account for the debt and the hidden debt service ..it's not as cheap as it is made to appear.
This is all done to "give them a purpose". All trade is brokered.
It's like buying a plasma tv at BestBuy at a whopping $300 discount ..but buying it with a 24% interest rate credit card...except you don't know it ......yet.
Quote:
Imagine for a moment not being able to afford A/C in our homes, driving cars without the luxurious options such as automatic transmission or electric windows. Imagine not being able to afford to dine out. Working your a$$ off to be able to afford to put a piece of bread in front of your kids. And it goes on and on.
Imagine a time when those luxuries didn't exist. Imagine that they will return to being just as out of reach?
..and who pays this debt service? It's not like you're told that there's a hidden tarrif on the product that you buy.
We were never able to truly afford our own domestically produced consumerism.
The same principle applies regardless of debt or otherwise. The market needs to be able to support the demand. If that cannot be done wihtout financing ...then it doesn't deserve to be in existance.
Only a fool would finance a 1 or 2 year economy with 30 year money. If you ran your household like we do the nation ..you would be a fool not deserving of the products that you are allowed to buy. You would be a failure in any and all accounts ..just the point of realization may be different.
Anyone who has any defensible position for this obviously has no fundamental grasp of "it all adds up" ..or, more likely, never has to truly pay for it. Now you can rationalize or intellectualize the "need" or the "it's too late now" aspects of it in terms of some global ideolical fostering philosophy ..but in just plain $$$ and cents ..it's a train wreck looking for a place to happen. It's a race that you hope you reach some finish line before you run out of steam.
It's a situation that has a KNOWN unfavorable outcome for citizens of this nation ..and some citizens of this nation, not only accept, but push the throttle faster alledging that it is "good".
Good for whom?
Quote:
Imagine our lakes and rivers polluted because we did not export the pollution to other countries. Or not being able to breathe the air.
So, we decided that we didn't want to wipe our own behinds? So we export our filth instead of dealing with it in an appropriate manner? So we can then sell cleanup technologies to other nations as they suffer from the effects of being enslaved to our $$?
Sounds socially responsible to me
Let the mud people do it.
Quote:
We are privilaged and those who complain about it need to re-examine the way they look at the things. We definitely are not the victims but the ones who benefit from the way the things are.
With all due respect ..and a big
on my face ..you have to have a fairly lofty perch to even have an attitude like that. I'd say that you never have to fear a layoff or a plant closure ..maybe you'll fret over making only an honest 11% instead of the more speculative 18%.
You are in a minority ..as much as you may think that you have plenty of company.
I love the confirmed "trickle down" economists. There's always a way to rationalize elitism (still a big smile on my face).
Someone once said: If you're going to run an aristocracy ..make sure you have better prep schools.