cheap, reliable, used pickup recommendations

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 16, 2003
Messages
227
Location
NC
I'm thinking about getting a pickup for light-duty hauling of stuff around town. I'll probably need it for a year or two, but might keep it longer if it can do 400 mile round trips without worrying me too much.

Don't need 4 wheel drive or a crew cab or anything fancy. I usually do my own auto repairs.

Any suggestions as to what to look for? My budget is "cheap (but I'd like to avoid doing a lot of work on it)"
 
Ray:
I picked up a 1997 Ford Ranger 2.3 w/5 speed manual last summer for the same reasons you are looking for one. The 2.3 Lima engine is bullet proof (though not very powerful in a pickup truck) and the entire truck has been trouble free so far. I recommend it highly. I had test driven a newer one with the Mazda designed 2.3 and it had a bit more pep.
 
I agree on the Ranger! I own one and they are awesome trucks. Pretty much all of the engines in them are very reliable, the auto transmissions are pretty decent but you gotta take care of them (fluid changes, etc). The manual transmissions are very reliable. All-around very tough, pretty cheap, excellent quality trucks. Also, in case you didn't know, the 1994-up Mazda trucks are the exact same thing as a Ranger, Ford actually builds them and just basically sticks some Mazda emblems on them. If you ever need any Ranger info, check out http://www.therangerstation.com there's TONS of useful info on there.
 
If your not a big person or clasticfobic(excuse the spelling). We have Rangers at work and they get beat, overloaded, very little maintence and run good and forever, alot have over 200,000. I drove one for awhile and it had 165,000 on it and was solid and ran great, it was hard to believe. I dont like little trucks, but was impressed.
 
Originally Posted By: Panzerman
clasticfobic(excuse the spelling)


If only what you wrote were at least a homophone. It's claustrophobic!
06.gif
 
I would agree with the Ranger. They are very solid trucks.

A 2.3L, 2.5L, or 3.0L with the manual will last 300K+ with basic maintenance. The OHV 4.0L is pretty solid too, but overkill for your needs and a gas guzzler.

The 2.3L/2.5L Lima engines are very easy to maintain. They take exactly 5 quarts of oil so you can just get the big jug, the filter is easy to reach, and they are fine with just about any oil. Manual transmissions are a simple drain and refill. It takes less time to change the transmission fluid than to do an engine oil change. FYI - the Mazda M5OD manual MUST have ATF!

Some things to consider...
- In 1998 Ford went from the old Twin I Beam design to IFS. The IFS is easier to align, stays in alignment, and is easy on tires. The Twin I Beam suspensions used before 1998 are VERY strong, but can be difficult to align. It is best to take it to a good suspension shop and not just the cheapest place.
- The Lima I4s (97-older 2.3, 98-01 2.5) were used from 1983 to 2001. In 2001 there were two four cylinders available, the 2.5L Lima and 2.3L Duratec. The Duratec has proven solid so far, but the Limas can take a lot of abuse. Fuel economy is slightly better with the Duratec.
- In 1995 Ford came out with the 4R44E and 4R55E automatic transmissions which are more reliable than the A4LD they replaced. They are related to the A4LD, but have stronger parts. The one in my 1995 Explorer still shifted great at 157K miles when I got rid of it for my current Ranger. As with any auto, make sure the fluid gets changed regularly. Ford suggests using Mercon V.
- In 1998 the length of the regular cab was increased by 3."
- Rustproofing improved greatly in 1993.
- The Mazda M5OD, the best manual used in the Ranger, was introduced in 1987, but Ford continued to offer the less reliable Mitsubishi manual for a couple years after that. Any 93 or newer truck will have the M5OD.
- Lima engines can be tricky to change spark plugs on. There are 8, and the ones on the intake manifold side are hard to reach. The good thing is the intake manifold comes off easily which makes the job much quicker. Not a big deal, just something I thought I'd mention.

One of my roommates has a 1997 Ranger with about 160,000 miles on it. It has the 2.3L and M5OD. It gets oil changes every 4K or so, but that's it. It runs great. The only problems are the fuel gauge which quit working a year ago, and the clamp on the positive battery cable corroded off. Not bad for that many miles. It goes on 145 mile round trips weekly without problems. A few months back it was stolen and involved in a police chase. The theif missed a turn and ran the truck up on a curb at 45~ MPH, then ran it into some bushes. The truck didn't even need an alignment afterwards and needed no repairs.
 
+1 on everything 01Ranger said.
Originally Posted By: 01rangerxl

The theif missed a turn and ran the truck up on a curb at 45~ MPH, then ran it into some bushes. The truck didn't even need an alignment afterwards and needed no repairs.

I did the same thing in my Explorer once. I wasn't being chased, just being stupid lol. No alignment or other repairs necessary!
grin2.gif
I love my Fords.. Hey 01Ranger, are you a member on TheRangerStation? You should join, you seem to know a lot and can probably help a lot of people there. My user name is exbass94.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for all the advice.

I'm monitoring craigs list for a ~95-98 ford ranger (and also just searching "Truck" to see what other options come up).

It seems as though sellers here in central nc think pretty highly of their vehicles based on their asking price. Usually more than 1k higher than edmunds.com says they go for. My son says thats just because "it doesn't cost anything to list it on craig's list".
 
Sometimes you have to bargain a little on CL, but you will probably be able to find a good Ranger there.

I saw one 1998 Ranger being sold for $500 because the timing belt broke. The thing is, this truck had a non-interference engine, as all Rangers with a timing belt do. I wanted it, but someone else was quicker.
 
Dakota 2wds are great and the rack and pinion steering stays nice and tight. Make sure it's not leaking and you're good to go.

Had one with the 2.5 and while it was very underpowered it was the perfect size. Except 3 feet 9 inches between the rear wheel wells, oops!
 
Brand loyalty in general is a weird topic to me. I like the Nissan D21. Obviously. Both of mine are 2.4l automatics. The 92 is my project vehicle when I retire and have more time and energy to dress it up a little. It runs great. The 96 is on permanent loan to my son as finishes his advanced studies. It will be gifted to him this summer at graduation with the proviso it comes back to me if he ever decides to upgrade. 25mpg, trailers my little flatboat with ease, great for the quick run to the landfill or hauling the riding mower to the shop. One problem. I see them everywhere on the road but very few in the want ads or the used car lots. And, no, you can't have mine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom