- Joined
- Jun 2, 2003
- Messages
- 23,587
I see the beer has arrived.

You could say it's a blend of both. Remember, modern aircraft don't (aren't allowed to) age like a mass-production automobile. I have flown EA-6Bs from the earliest production batches that have been totally rebuilt several times and existed in multiple, totally different configurations. I've also flown ones that were among the last built, and virtually factory fresh at the time. Operationally, you really can't tell the difference. Yeah, there are some subtle "feel" differences, and they smell different, but if anything, I'd say the old ones seemed to be a bit more reliable than the really new ones (maybe Grumman was slipping in the later years...). Sure, I imagine that the Australian budget won't allow the turnover of planes like we have, but properly kept and upgraded, a jet like this will be every bit as effective as some of the newer stuff that's flying. Eventually, it will get left behind, but that's a while off yet.quote:
Originally posted by milwaukee:
I would bet it is more of an economic feature that the F111 is still in service and NOT the features/ability of the aircraft.
(...snip...)
His grandson may end up flying the same plane.quote:
Originally posted by ekpolk:
I reviewed the pictures, and this guy did indeed perform an arrested, gear-up landing. Obviously, for an F-111, this works well. My hat's off to the young pilot. He saved the Australian taxpayers an irreplaceable asset, and he's earned the right to tell one heck of a "war story" to his grand kids (several decades from now...).