Can you put two muti-meters in Parallel to double amperage measurement?

Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
3,472
Location
IL
Most are rated at 10a, if I wire in series I should get a good 20a of capacity? (just divide the meter reading by 2)

I'm measuring fuel pump power draw, and many are near/over the limit blowing my mutimeter fuse.
 
Internally an ammeter has a conductive link with very low resistance value so current passes straight thru. Having 2 meters in series both will see exact same current flowing and blow their 10A fuses. ...if you need amperage regularly check out the clip on amprobes.
 
Subbed due to interest, been a very long time so my take might be wrong.

Kawiguy is right about series; however parallel double capacity since two paths with 10A, so yes is my swag.
 
Why don't you just give it a try? Start small so you don't damage anything. Maybe you could give all of us a tip if it works.
 
Use a clamp meter, or buy a shunt. The shunt would be inserted in series with the load, and generate a small DC voltage for the meter to read. Size the shunt to the max drop you wish to allow, or a bit smaller.
 
Parallel is the only way it might work and because of the manufacturing differences you would have to read both meters and add them together. Remember current is like water, all that goes in must come out so in order to lower the volume through any one branch you need to give it a second path. If you do it in series you just force all the water/current through both meters one after the other.
 
Both meters will read the same current . If they are both 10 amp meters then they will both read THEIR max .
 
Both meters will read the same current . If they are both 10 amp meters then they will both read THEIR max .

Not necessarily. In series they're going going to read the same thing (unless it's at the max). In parallel it may be unpredictable since they would likely have different loads - even if the same model. The lower load will read more current although theoretically once could add them together unless both are still being maxed out.

I assume that this isn't a case where a fuse is blown, but just the max that can be reliably read out.

I wouldn't really want to mess with that much current unless it's low voltage DC.
 
The safest way is to put a shunt (very low resistance resistor) in series and measure the voltage across it, as supton mentioned. This is what’s happening inside of your meter anyway. Other than that, if both meters have identical shunts, so one doesn’t max out before the other, then the idea works. I’d guess running current will be about 6A.
 
Not necessarily. In series they're going going to read the same thing (unless it's at the max). In parallel it may be unpredictable since they would likely have different loads - even if the same model. The lower load will read more current although theoretically once could add them together unless both are still being maxed out.

I assume that this isn't a case where a fuse is blown, but just the max that can be reliably read out.

I wouldn't really want to mess with that much current unless it's low voltage DC.
You are still not going to read a 20a load with two 10a meters . As suggested a shunt would work , but who has one of those lying around ? Before I retired I had access to all sorts of stuff like that . No need for it now .
 
Whoever said that both meters would have to be identical is correct because what the meter is really doing is measuring the voltage drop across a shunt resistor. If the meters were not the same there is the possibility that more than 10 amps would go through one meter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LvR
I've parallelled inline shunted 'wattmeters' for significant loads such as engine starting.

The wattmeters are rated for a 200 amps surge.
they come with 8awg pigtails. I attach 45 amp anderson powerpole connectors.
During the engine start test, it was interesting how much more max current one wattmeter recorded than the other one, jutst die to lead length and perhaps condition .

When trying to measure amperage that a charging battery is accepting at high states of charge, I have noticed that while it migh tonly need 2 amps to be held at 14.8v, but when first hooked up, the wattmeter's record/display 18 or more amps before quickly tapering to that 2 amps.

I will ONLY use inline DMMS when i know the surge cannot exceed the 10 amp fuse rating.

A clampon DC ammeter might not read very accurately at loads under 1 amp, but there is no danger of smoking it like one could with a DMM.
I've an older sears craftsman DC clampmeter, and it seems to be capable of measuring relatively accurately down to as low as 0.06 to 0.08 amps @12vdc and within 2.5% of a trusted shunted ammeter, at 120 amps .

My harbor fright free DMM internal glass fuse often is coated with tin foil. too often I had forgotten to move the leads when going back to check voltage after checking amperage, an pop goes the fuse.
Glass fuses are not cheap.

The RC style wattmeters are an awesome tool to have, even if them are imperfect in terms of accuracy.

There are dozens of clones of this basic unit linked below. Some have 100 amp surge ratings and 14awg leads, some have 130 amp surge ratings and 12 awg leads, some have 200 amp surge ratings and 8awg leads.

I pass 45+ amps continuously through the 8 awg ones and started my engine over a paralleled pair of wattmeters through 2 pairs of anderson 45 amp powerpoles. No issues.

https://www.amazon.com/GT-Power-Ana...00C1BZSYO/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8

There's also some hall effect dc ammeters available for under 20$ that can handle 100 200 and 400 amps, but most have a 0.2 amp resolution, and nearby magnetic fields screw them up, and they tend to drift over time and need to be rezeroed regularly when it is known no current is passing through the cable which the ring sensor is surrounding.

https://www.amazon.com/bayite-Digit...ca87d&pd_rd_wg=8Y3zR&pd_rd_i=B01DDQM6Z4&psc=1

I've got 4 of the above linked ammeters. 2 battery banks, one reads alternator current from one of two alternators, one reads amps into or out of either battery bank. I trust them to ~ 5 % accuracy, when I rezero them before current passes through the cable/wire the sensor surrounds.

There are shunted ammeters with similar digital displays. Such shunted ammeters, almost exclusively need to be wired inline on the negative cable, whereas the hall effect sensors can go over a positive cable, if that is more convenient which it often is in my uses.

My shunted ammeters, of similar ratings and price point, have not been as accurate as the hall effect sensor from multiple observations with multiple different products.

Do note that the ring sensor of above link, is supposedly match to the display, so if getting more than one do not mix them up.
I've no issues regarding accuracy, when extending teh 3 wire ribbon cable for a much more distant sensor/ display.
 
Most are rated at 10a, if I wire in series I should get a good 20a of capacity? (just divide the meter reading by 2)

I'm measuring fuel pump power draw, and many are near/over the limit blowing my mutimeter fuse.
Won't do a thing. Current is the same throughout a series circuit.
 
I've parallelled inline shunted 'wattmeters' for significant loads such as engine starting.

The wattmeters are rated for a 200 amps surge.
they come with 8awg pigtails. I attach 45 amp anderson powerpole connectors.
During the engine start test, it was interesting how much more max current one wattmeter recorded than the other one, jutst die to lead length and perhaps condition .

When trying to measure amperage that a charging battery is accepting at high states of charge, I have noticed that while it migh tonly need 2 amps to be held at 14.8v, but when first hooked up, the wattmeter's record/display 18 or more amps before quickly tapering to that 2 amps.

I will ONLY use inline DMMS when i know the surge cannot exceed the 10 amp fuse rating.

A clampon DC ammeter might not read very accurately at loads under 1 amp, but there is no danger of smoking it like one could with a DMM.
I've an older sears craftsman DC clampmeter, and it seems to be capable of measuring relatively accurately down to as low as 0.06 to 0.08 amps @12vdc and within 2.5% of a trusted shunted ammeter, at 120 amps .

My harbor fright free DMM internal glass fuse often is coated with tin foil. too often I had forgotten to move the leads when going back to check voltage after checking amperage, an pop goes the fuse.
Glass fuses are not cheap.

The RC style wattmeters are an awesome tool to have, even if them are imperfect in terms of accuracy.

There are dozens of clones of this basic unit linked below. Some have 100 amp surge ratings and 14awg leads, some have 130 amp surge ratings and 12 awg leads, some have 200 amp surge ratings and 8awg leads.

I pass 45+ amps continuously through the 8 awg ones and started my engine over a paralleled pair of wattmeters through 2 pairs of anderson 45 amp powerpoles. No issues.

https://www.amazon.com/GT-Power-Ana...00C1BZSYO/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8

There's also some hall effect dc ammeters available for under 20$ that can handle 100 200 and 400 amps, but most have a 0.2 amp resolution, and nearby magnetic fields screw them up, and they tend to drift over time and need to be rezeroed regularly when it is known no current is passing through the cable which the ring sensor is surrounding.

https://www.amazon.com/bayite-Digit...ca87d&pd_rd_wg=8Y3zR&pd_rd_i=B01DDQM6Z4&psc=1

I've got 4 of the above linked ammeters. 2 battery banks, one reads alternator current from one of two alternators, one reads amps into or out of either battery bank. I trust them to ~ 5 % accuracy, when I rezero them before current passes through the cable/wire the sensor surrounds.

There are shunted ammeters with similar digital displays. Such shunted ammeters, almost exclusively need to be wired inline on the negative cable, whereas the hall effect sensors can go over a positive cable, if that is more convenient which it often is in my uses.

My shunted ammeters, of similar ratings and price point, have not been as accurate as the hall effect sensor from multiple observations with multiple different products.

Do note that the ring sensor of above link, is supposedly match to the display, so if getting more than one do not mix them up.
I've no issues regarding accuracy, when extending teh 3 wire ribbon cable for a much more distant sensor/ display.
I have several of the RC type watt meters as I am an avid electric RC flyer. They are great to have around. I have one set up just to measure how much charge wattage is put into my lawnmower or generator batteries when charging.
 
Putting them in parallel theoretically would split the current, but in reality the current shunts may not be the same so one would probably be taking more current than the other. There are standalone amp shunts for measuring high current that are designed to work with multimeters. They either specify their resistance, or they will note the full scale voltage at their rated current, like 100mV at 100 amps. You would set your multimeter to measure volts (not amps), and determine the current through the shunt using Ohm's Law.
 
It can be done. The way to do it is to use Fluke jumper test leads, and first parallel both identical meters. (These special leads can accept leads into them) Then plug the positive working lead into meter 1 (+) and the negative working lead into meter 2 (-).

This keeps power even between both meters.

Then test a 5A load and see how they behave.


9251572056094.jpg
 
You can put two meters in parallel, and they will probably have slightly different internal resistance so will not share the load perfectly equal to each other, but if the current draw is near 10A, they should be close enough to get the job done.

The thing I'm wondering is why do you need to measure this? Are you making a fuel circuit from scratch and need to determine the right fuse value or wire gauge to use for it? If not, it seems more likely that the things of interest are whether you have too much voltage drop arriving at the pump connector, and whether the pump is producing the spec'd pressure when provided with sufficient voltage.
 
Back
Top Bottom