Bruce Lee v ?

[Leo99]

Originally Posted by SteveSRT8
Originally Posted by Triple_Se7en
Originally Posted by Leo99
My money would be on Conor.


That's funny!
Such match would be over in less than one minute beyond the time where Lee changes his ring tactic from defensive to offense. Still be inside a hypothetical 1st Round. Lee wouldn't need over two minutes to end the Conor fight.



Bruce was ridiculously quick and would hit Conor 20 times in a blur before he even knew it.

No contest, just watch some of the actual videos of BL in action on youtube. He was amazing.


You probably think Bruce Lee could really play ping-pong with nun-chucks.

 

[PimTac]

Bruce Lee's speed was his best weapon. While it's hard to compare people in different forms of fighting, I do think Lee's speed would have a distinct advantage over some of the names mentioned here.

 

[Leo99]

Originally Posted by PimTac
Bruce Lee's speed was his best weapon. While it's hard to compare people in different forms of fighting, I do think Lee's speed would have a distinct advantage over some of the names mentioned here.

 

[ridgerunner]

Who the fook is Bruce Lee!?

 

[02SE]

Originally Posted by Leo99
Originally Posted by PimTac
Bruce Lee's speed was his best weapon. While it's hard to compare people in different forms of fighting, I do think Lee's speed would have a distinct advantage over some of the names mentioned here.

That should say: "Until I'm losing, and bite their ear off".

 

[Dallas69]

Bruce Lee was very skilled but not an actual fighter.
There is a huge difference.

 

[dave1251]

Originally Posted by Dallas69
Bruce Lee was very skilled but not an actual fighter.
There is a huge difference.


The vast majority of people who never have been in an actual fight don't understand this.