Reading Alarm's thread about using his router after modem, I have a similar situation but didn't want to gum up his thread.
Currently I have a ATT PACE "gateway" for my VDSL internet service and prefer to use my own router. Unfortunately the PACE modem doesn't provide a "true" bridge mode, but the workaround is to use DMZ to pass things to the router. Is this a double NAT situation? Does anyone know a better solution?
The reason for setting things up like this is to A) be able to configure DNS using a pi-hole, as the PACE has no provision for specifying DNS address and, B) use my TP-Link Deco mesh wi-fi system. Currently the PACE is in DMZ and assigns an IP to the router, which then does DHCP for my ethernet connections and TPLink wifi (which is in access point, not router mode and uses ethernet backhaul). Ultimately I'd like to replace the router and pi-hole with a pfsense box.
Currently I have a ATT PACE "gateway" for my VDSL internet service and prefer to use my own router. Unfortunately the PACE modem doesn't provide a "true" bridge mode, but the workaround is to use DMZ to pass things to the router. Is this a double NAT situation? Does anyone know a better solution?
The reason for setting things up like this is to A) be able to configure DNS using a pi-hole, as the PACE has no provision for specifying DNS address and, B) use my TP-Link Deco mesh wi-fi system. Currently the PACE is in DMZ and assigns an IP to the router, which then does DHCP for my ethernet connections and TPLink wifi (which is in access point, not router mode and uses ethernet backhaul). Ultimately I'd like to replace the router and pi-hole with a pfsense box.