Bosch water injection boosts MPG and cut emissions

Status
Not open for further replies.
hmm... catch the water from the AC, suck it up (through vacuum) to the main water tank and you'll only need to add ethanol + water in winter. if you have the main tank air tight, it'll suck the water from the AC right in as you're using the water injection.
 
I have a water injection kit from the 70s!

I am really surprised that the EPA hasn't mandated it. I mean, they mandated the asinine pee tank systems which have ridiculous cost.

My guess is they haven't figured out a way to make water injection super expensive and a major inconvenience.
 
True WW2 planes had water injection , also the B52 and KC135 had water injected engines , thousands of gallons were sprayed into the engines to produce more thrust on takeoff but it made them smoke badly and it made them extremely loud.
 
Originally Posted By: RhondaHonda
Interesting. I wonder how they keep the water from freezing in cold climates?


Back in the day they mixed washer AF in with it, or used it straight up. I wonder what impact if any that would have though.
 
The biggest problem is that if the system goes awry, you have either a hydro-locked engine the next day, or corrosion issues in the upper cylinder ... As long as the system is functioning, no problem. One drippy water injector and you have big problems ...
 
Originally Posted By: Ducked
Originally Posted By: HTSS_TR


Quote:
The BMW M4 GTS, a high-performance luxury coupe capable of hitting 493 horsepower, is the first production vehicle to use a water injection system. .



This is tosh.

desastre_2.jpg


1962



Learn something new every day. I saw one of those aluminum 215 blocks at a junkyard once, but never knew they could be had with a turbo.

Jetfire Article from Hemmings Blog
 
Originally Posted By: Shannow
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
I have run Edelbrock's water injection setup on street cars since the late 70's. It is GREAT for controlling combustion temps and pre-ignition issues. Worked especially good on old style heads.

We used 50-50 water/alcohol. Many issues with clogging and other small things to keep it running, but it worked well. I could add tons of advance to the timing and still not knock...


Back in the day, I was (for want of a better word) technical advisor on a low buck Hillman Hunter Hill Climb sports sedan, big turbo, big boost, single 1-3/4" S.U. carb 1725cc 4 potter.

We came up with a boost sensitive water injection system by porting boost to a pressurised tank, which then fed water into the turbo intake through a basketball needle...worked great...high speed enrichment, pull the choke on, and the SU carb would drop the jet that the needle sat in and get the lambda back somewhere reasonable.

(the guy later adapted a Haltech to it himself, which I was pretty impressed with)


Water has a surprising effect on power in many cases. Tolerance level varies per platform, but I have seen real world increases. Small, but with the added bennies of cleanliness and low egts it's easy to like if you are a serious enthusiast...
 
Originally Posted By: Miller88
I have a water injection kit from the 70s!

I am really surprised that the EPA hasn't mandated it. I mean, they mandated the asinine pee tank systems which have ridiculous cost.

My guess is they haven't figured out a way to make water injection super expensive and a major inconvenience.



Hahaha, give them a little time, they'll surely muck it up...
 
Along these lines, people have experimented with 6 cycle engines. The extra cycles were for injecting water and not gas. The water would turn to steam in the combustion chamber and rapidly expand, pushing the piston down. It produced more power, and used less fuel.

It is a way to reduce some of the energy loss to heat. Not sure why it is not being developed by major players... maybe impractical/too expensive for the gains?
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: DeafBrad
Along these lines, people have experimented with 6 cycle engines. The extra cycles were for injecting water and not gas. The water would turn to steam in the combustion chamber and rapidly expand, pushing the piston down. It produced more power, and used less fuel.

It is a way to reduce some of the energy loss to heat. Not sure why it is not being developed by major players... maybe impractical/too expensive for the gains?


Can't figure out how to modify my posts if I come back at another time. Is there a way?

Here is what I was going to try to edit in: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six-stroke_engine
 
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
I have run Edelbrock's water injection setup on street cars since the late 70's. It is GREAT for controlling combustion temps and pre-ignition issues. Worked especially good on old style heads.

We used 50-50 water/alcohol. Many issues with clogging and other small things to keep it running, but it worked well. I could add tons of advance to the timing and still not knock...


Vari-Jection was the product name; I had a 430 Buick I installed it on; GREAT product.
 
Originally Posted By: FordCapriDriver
True WW2 planes had water injection , also the B52 and KC135 had water injected engines , thousands of gallons were sprayed into the engines to produce more thrust on takeoff but it made them smoke badly and it made them extremely loud.


The water wasn't for thrust. The water was for cooling. And it the smoke was from rich combustion, not from water. They were loud (with or without water) just like every other turbojet of the era.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom