Based on the liquimoly TuV sheet, it seems their MoS2 reduces wear better than BN. However, their rep mentioned BN(Ceratec) is better than MoS2/Motor Protect.
I know Bn is better because it is suitable for diesel too because no issue with sulphuric acid generation that may happen with MoS2.
However is there any other reason why BN is better ?
Is it just because BN now is cheaper than Moly, where China does not control the market and dictate the price ?
I assume for manual transmission, the MoS2 should be more suitable and handle load better due to no combustion process, is that a correct assumption ?
Thank you.
I know Bn is better because it is suitable for diesel too because no issue with sulphuric acid generation that may happen with MoS2.
However is there any other reason why BN is better ?
Is it just because BN now is cheaper than Moly, where China does not control the market and dictate the price ?
I assume for manual transmission, the MoS2 should be more suitable and handle load better due to no combustion process, is that a correct assumption ?
Thank you.