The numbers look fine to me. I guess it would somewhat depend upon your severity factor. Heavy loading can contribute to a bit higher wear. I agree it's not anything to panic about.
Nice to see some proof about how oil knows no limit of time, only exposure to use. At some point, I suspect the add-pack would start to deteriorate, but this proves that time is pretty far down the road. One sample is not enough to be conclusive, but is sure can't be ignored, either.
One thing I'd like to point out, as a matter of using this UOA as a jumping off point for a related topic, is that some people seek (and even lust for) a CH-4 oil, begruding a CJ-4 oil. In no way does this UOA disappoint; the numbers are very desireable! But neither does it exemplify some magical realm that CJ-4 can't touch. The CH-4 did a nice job; no more, no less. We've seen CJ-4 lubes do just as well. My point is that many people crave older fluids out of some mis-placed notion that CJ-4 is "lacking". This just shows that results say otherwise.
It would have been nice to see a TBN, to see about the viability of continued use!
Your fuel, water, coolant, insolubles all show the ISB running very cleanly.
Enjoy the ride!