BG Tranny flush - yes or no

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: spk2000
There was no filter change or pan dropped. The claim was that the cleaner and backflush on the filter would clean it off. I do recall that he told me that my car was doing the pumping so not real sure how he did that with their machine. They did disconnect the line from the radiator and he mentioned that some newer GM vehicle actually have a quick connect type of system that was even easier for him.


Their cleaner may (not will) remove some of the greasy crud from the filter but none of the particle crud. It could be filled with particles and you have no idea. Were it me, I would want any crud of any kind tossed away with the filter being replaced, not loosened and floating around the transmission. Hopefully anything loosened was in the old ATF and gone. But I would guess that it does not get it all, and the new ATF will loosen it up over time and yes it will be floating around in your transmission for awhile.

They did not backflush the filter. They cannot do they with a flush machine.

Places that do a flush without first replacing the filter are just lazy and trying to make a quick buck saying their BG chemical will handle it.

But a flush is better than doing nothing and keeping old ATF in the transmission until it dies. But they can do an even better job by replacing the filter.
 
Last edited:
Its a FLUID EXCHANGE. Best thing to happen to a automatic transmission since its invention. I sold and handled literary thousands of these on many different vehicles with always great results. All your doing is replacing 95% of the fliud with new. It is NOT a FLUSH. BG been at it for years.
 
I went to a Ford Dealer to have a Ford Fusion Flushed several years ago and was told they only did the BG product. The vehicle had under 50,XXX miles on it and was only there for preventative maintenance. IIRC the invoice had numbers on it that made me think it used a cleaner and then their universal fluid. I did find some kind of document that indicated that it matched the unique fluid used in my application (not Mercon 5). I could not tell any difference in the before and after except there was one time in traffic where the RPMs would go up and the transmission slipped and then ran fine for the next 5,000 miles I never had another problem till the vehicle got totalled. Im not saying the BG exchange caused this, just relaying my experience.
 
Quote:
It was then topped off with their additive package.


That's scary.

Most of these flushes with solvents and additives are designed to reduce the size of your pocketbook.
 
Last edited:
local toyo dealer here does the same thing. Even the WS cars get a fluid exchange and refill with BG synthetic. the shift quality is harder/firmer with BF syn as it is a thicker fluid than WS. Dealer stands behind their work ---- but I didn't like this----

(I'd bought the truck from another dealer, and found maintenance history at the toyo dealer... the trans and other major tune up items had been done a few months prior. I dumped half the BG and replaced with amsoil -- WS type -- it's their ATF just for WS transmissions-- and it's been quick, smooth, and happy since.)

Anyway--- I think BG products are pretty good and wouldn't worry about it. Dealer certainly prefered to use BG than the factory stuff, and from all indications, this is a good dealer. I had them do other work and the $ was low and the quality after the job was quite good.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: 229
I just serviced an '11 Tacoma with 28K miles with Toyota WS fluid that had a shudder so bad you would think the transmission was history. It came back to life.


I hope Toyota paid for it?

Severe shudder at 28K miles is totally unacceptable, regardless of fluid or change interval. Any modern AT should be able to go 120K miles + on the OE fluid without a hiccup.

With shudder at 28K miles I'd want a brand new trans, and if they can't supply that, a new truck. Even if it seems fine after a change, who knows how much life the shuddering took off the trans, and what is actually wrong with it?

Can't even get a decent Taco anymore...
 
Originally Posted By: 01rangerxl
Originally Posted By: 229
I just serviced an '11 Tacoma with 28K miles with Toyota WS fluid that had a shudder so bad you would think the transmission was history. It came back to life.


I hope Toyota paid for it?

Severe shudder at 28K miles is totally unacceptable, regardless of fluid or change interval. Any modern AT should be able to go 120K miles + on the OE fluid without a hiccup.

With shudder at 28K miles I'd want a brand new trans, and if they can't supply that, a new truck. Even if it seems fine after a change, who knows how much life the shuddering took off the trans, and what is actually wrong with it?

Can't even get a decent Taco anymore...


Toyota does not take care of that. They say it is a maintenance item. Even if shorter time than expected.
 
The owner's manual says to inspect the AT fluid every 30K miles.
Looks like it will have to be changed at least on this interval.

Originally Posted By: 229
Originally Posted By: 01rangerxl
Originally Posted By: 229
I just serviced an '11 Tacoma with 28K miles with Toyota WS fluid that had a shudder so bad you would think the transmission was history. It came back to life.


I hope Toyota paid for it?

Severe shudder at 28K miles is totally unacceptable, regardless of fluid or change interval. Any modern AT should be able to go 120K miles + on the OE fluid without a hiccup.

With shudder at 28K miles I'd want a brand new trans, and if they can't supply that, a new truck. Even if it seems fine after a change, who knows how much life the shuddering took off the trans, and what is actually wrong with it?

Can't even get a decent Taco anymore...


Toyota does not take care of that. They say it is a maintenance item. Even if shorter time than expected.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom