ARX and rinse oil confusion

Status
Not open for further replies.
quote:

No offense but if these observations are only based on these 30 application, it is worthless, why? because for it be scientific, you need to have two exact samples (in this case, same exact engines with same exact driving patterns, which is impossible) then rinse one with Semi Synthetic oil and the other with conventional oil.

I disagree. With that sample size it IS statistically significant.

Rinsing with a non-LL, non-startup, non-BS conventional oil is the best approach for rinsing since there is no intereference with the special RX esters in getting to the metal.
 
quote:

I am a 61 year old widow that know's nothing about car's.

That's why you got u's to help you out with direction's.
wink.gif
 
quote:

Rinsing with a non-LL, non-startup, non-BS conventional oil is the best approach for rinsing since there is no intereference with the special RX esters in getting to the metal.

And beyond all those fine reasons ...why waste the money for stuff that is not going to be in that long?? You don't have to use bottled spring water to wash your car. (or do you
confused.gif
hmmm..Dr. Haas ..just what do you wash a Maybach with, hmmm? said with Wm. F. Buckley Jr. type "Hmmm"
grin.gif
)
 
quote:

Originally posted by znamya:

quote:

Originally posted by MolaKule:
[qb]

I disagree. With that sample size it IS statistically significant.

Rinsing with a non-LL, non-startup, non-BS conventional oil is the best approach for rinsing since there is no intereference with the special RX esters in getting to the metal.


What is statistically significant? He only used conventional oil in the all 30 cars and he saw good results, can you get from this data that the synthetic oil interferes with Auto-rx's cleaning. I know that synthetic oil is not good for the rinse phase, the only thing I am saying that Rick is stating an argument rather than proving something.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom