that's epic data. Thanks for (re)posting. It sort of confounds some of my conventional wisdom around higher SAPS being better SAPS and that star polymers are always better than cheap OCPs.Unfortuantely not a lot of technical things are posted here anymore. It's mostly opinion brand pushing, which is fine but we lost some formulators and others that would occassionally drop some good info.
Hot Drain DIY Oil Change Guys: I’m gonna drive around and get my oil good and hot so flows better and gets all those nasty contaminants out.
~Oil now at over 200F~
Hot Drain DIY Oil Change Guys: Ouch! This oil is hot!![]()
It's a good quesiton I dont know the answer to. The only issue I can see with some of the ESP line or mid/SAP oils is the lower detergent levels. I don't know how confident I'd be running them too long. This is where M1 EP with more AO and detergetns may be better in longer drains than ESP.that's epic data. Thanks for (re)posting. It sort of confounds some of my conventional wisdom around higher SAPS being better SAPS and that star polymers are always better than cheap OCPs.
It is possible the mid or lower SAPS oils can run even cleaner than full SAPS oils if given a premium base?
I use the Stahlbus, which is quite similar (except my GX get the fumoto).This is why I got the Valvo Max drain system.
ESP 0W30 has Ca above 1700. EP Ca level is just a bit over 600.It's a good quesiton I dont know the answer to. The only issue I can see with some of the ESP line or mid/SAP oils is the lower detergent levels. I don't know how confident I'd be running them too long. This is where M1 EP with more AO and detergetns may be better in longer drains than ESP.
Long drain oils are usually fortified with higher detergent levels (helps keeps engines clean) and some of the ESP line have only about 1,600ppm of Ca. However I'm not a formulator so who knows what they could be using in its place. I know the M1 Triple line apparenlty has a lot of dispersants.
Yes, 5W30 has a new Infineum add pack with lower Ca levels.Thanks. I was thinking of the new ESP 5w30 SP which has about 1,000ppm of Ca/477mg. ESP line seems to use POE where was EP uses AN. It's certainly possible the ESP line is better and would run cleaner than EP. I just have no way of knowing. Face value I'd lean towards ESP based on the stringent specs. M1 EP is rated for 20k miles.
My main concern for my specific engine is motor oil shearing out of grade which based on an extensive amount of UOA data, is a common occurrence with most product offerings within a standard interval and oftentimes in less than half that.
I haven't seen it either.I sure haven’t seen countless UOA where the oil has sheared out of grade. I seen many where there is fuel dilution which causes it to thin, but very few where there is confirmed mechanical shear of the VM.
If you really have a mechanical shear problem then something like HPL no-VI is a good choice. That won’t shear, nor would a monograde oil, assuming you could find an appropriate one.
Either way if you’re seeing an oil go out of grade, it doesn’t make much sense to doggedly stick to the manual recommendation.
I haven't seen it either.
@Blagoje are you referring to the UOA's that are posted on the Outback forum? Many of those are Blackstone so fuel is not even tested. There are many more UOA's on the FA20DIT on nasioc and the Forester forum, but the same situation applies. Viscosity loss from fuel contamination is not the same as mechanical shear.
Imagine doing two VOA's on the same oil and the oil from one of those samples is replaced with 5% fuel. Would you consider the likely viscosity loss in the VOA result as shearing out of grade?![]()
Or you can just continue to post inaccurate information and then cry when people with more expertise ask you about it. Your call.Please forgive my inaccuracy, whether it be by mechanical shear or fuel dilution or whatever contributing circumstance my number one concern is loss of viscosity out of grade.
Perhaps if someone has actual expertise on the subject they can comment but I don't see what the point of continuously asking questions is especially if someone wants to act as if they are speaking from a position of authority or experience but is unwilling to share what they apparently claim to know that others don't. They might as well just get off the website if they're not going to make any effort to engage in good faith.
If the oil was dark at 1000 miles this tells me a few things:Seems like a silly question, but I figured I'd ask anyways. We just picked up a used 2018 Chevrolet Equinox with 91k miles from a dealer. 1.5l Turbo LYX. Oil was freshly changed when we bought it....no signs of sludge from what I could see through the oil filler. Runs great. No complaints.
I just did the 1st oil change this past weekend at 1k miles to get the unknown dealer commodity stuff out of there and put in some Valvoline Restore and Protect to clean up any deposits. Unknown maintenance but I figured a few OCI's of VRP wouldn't hurt.
When we bought it the oil was brand new looking. After 1k miles it had darkened significantly on the dip stick and when i drained it it looked very dark, like it was due for an oil change. The other thing I was surprised at was how HOT the oil was!!! I normally take my vehicles for a short drive to get the oil good and warm/hot before changing.
This oil was super hot! I could barely turn the drain bolt by hand it was that hot. Surprised me a bit actually.
So that brings me to my question. Are turbo engines harder on oil than non-turbo engines? If so, what in the oil tends to wear down fastest? Does it shear faster than non-turbo'd engines? Does the oil oxidize faster? Anything else I'm not aware of? Just looking for some education. Thanks!
**EDIT** I should mention we don't drive the car aggressively but my wife does A LOT of short trips and idling. So for that, we fall in the severe maintenance category. I drive it to work once per week on the highway (45 miles each way) for the fun of it.
Not necessarily. Some oils will darken very quickly due to the nature of the additive composition. I have found that M1's Triple Action oils will darken very, very quickly...even when used in well-maintained engines.If the oil was dark at 1000 miles this tells me a few things:
1) The OCI's were beyond what most of us do here.
2) Cheap Oil was Used
3) The oil was never checked between OCI's
I am positive on Number 1 and 2, Number 3 is kind of a guess.
Yep, whatever temperature it reaches going up on ramps !Yeah I'm done with that. Idling in the driveway for 10 minutes is going to be my new "hot drain". Warm enough to be thinner, not so hot that I can't handle the filter.
Run ESP on the GM Turbo test or IIIH and get back to me. You can't. Being you can't you don't know if it is better.
Two things that keep popping up from people that are complete nonsense:
All API licensed oils are formulted to barely meet the specs. Not true.
Euro oils by default are better than API oils that greatly exceed the stringent GM Turbo, TEOST, IIIH, IVB tests. Not true.
I'm not sure there is one. Comparing oils meeting different specs can be tricky. ESP is probably the better overall oil though based on the specs it meets. The EP oils are built for 20k mile drains though so they're also very good.Which OTS API spec oil do you think would outperform M1 ESP 0W-30 for example? Aren't you running M1 ESP after Amsoil?
It don't believe it suggests that star polymers are significantly worse. Sure OCP performed a little better for the test but it's still just a test. There are other tests where OCP does worse so it's a constant balancing act between competing objectives. An other thing is that the additive package (High Moly, or avg detergent) had an even larger impact than the type of VII used.that's epic data. Thanks for (re)posting. It sort of confounds some of my conventional wisdom around higher SAPS being better SAPS and that star polymers are always better than cheap OCPs.
It is possible the mid or lower SAPS oils can run even cleaner than full SAPS oils if given a premium base?