Every manufacturer has VVT . As far as reliability is concerned is concerned , are they created equal? Always wondered. TY WarDawg
That is the trouble with reliability. It is boringToyota VVTi is meh and reliable VVT.
I'm going to GUESS Acura NSXWithout cheating and using internet...can anyone say the first car that had VTEC in it?
I can only speak about the 2.4 Multi-Air vs 2.0 VVT . The 2.4 has proven to be more problematic and more expensive to repair valve train wise.What about the Fiat Multi-Air?
If not the NSX then the preludeWithout cheating and using internet...can anyone say the first car that had VTEC in it?
Lots of different terms and systems being thrown around in here.
VVT is variable valve timing. It changes the relationship of the camshaft(s) to the crankshaft (called phasing), allowing camshaft timing to change based on engine operating conditions. VVT is largely an emissions control strategy. There is some performance benefit in retarding and advancing camshaft timing at various points in the engine operating range but the biggest benefit is controlling emissions. You will rarely (if ever) have a dual-VVT engine with an EGR valve. Being able to control camshaft timing allows the introduction of exhaust gas to the intake stream through reversion. Again, small performance benefit, large emissions benefit.
VVT is pretty much the standard on all engines now. Every manufacturer uses vane-type actuators with oil control solenoids. Pretty standard stuff across the board. You'll see it called many things: VCT (Ford), VANOS (BMW), VVT-i (Toyota), AVCS (Subaru). They're all pretty much the same technology.
There is a different set of acronyms and names though: VTEC and iVTEC (Honda), VVTL-i (Toyota), i-AVLS (Subaru), MultiAir (Fiat), Valvetronic (BMW), etc. There are more advanced systems that typically also change camshaft lift and/or duration during engine operation. They all include VVT but go way beyond in terms of complexity and vary wildly in function, capability, mechanization, and reliability.
BMW VANOS is fun and expensive VVT.
Honda VTEC is fun and reliable VVT.
Toyota VVTi is meh and reliable VVT.
That's not VVT that you felt. It's the Toyota VTEC you felt on the VVTL-i systemCant speak for vvt on higher end German vehicles. I Never had any issues on a Toyota and only issue I heard of on a Honda is the vtec solenoid being troublesome. However the newer vvt's are not as hard hitting as the past they're more civilly tuned. I remember vtec from the late 90s early 2000s and you knew about it when vtec engaged. Even the old celica gt-s and Corolla xrs had a bang when vvt hit.
The Toyota A25A-FKS is a mainstream engine with Dual VVT-i (electric cam phasing on the intake cam) with a EGR valve.
https://parts.toyota.com/a/Toyota_2...UST-GAS-RECIRCULATION-SYSTEM/526430-2501.html