I notice a much larger difference going from ethanol fuels to non ethanol if you can get them.
My small seasonal engines appreciate that too.I notice a much larger difference going from ethanol fuels to non ethanol if you can get them.
It buys me 15-45 more miles per tank. I've averaged about 26 mpg over the time I've owned the car. It comes down to the difference between the cost of regular and premium, which has varied a great deal. In other words, sometimes it pays.So all in- does it pay for the upgrade?
My neon always runs smoother on midgrade gas. Part of it is I'm fairly sure that the idle air control valve is bad which is common.For a daily driver that runs ok on 87, filled up with 89- runs better, more responsive, overall nicer drive. But is it a wash on $ differential vs economy? My impression- it is NOT.
Same here; I put Shell 93 in the GLC 300 loaner I had while the C43 was in for its Service A.No 93 around my neck of the woods, 91 is the premium stuff.
I run 91 in the FJ09 triple and the supercharged triple Scarab jet boat, 89 in all the yard implements except those that are 2-cycle. Those get the pre-mixed 50:1 or 40:1 stuff from the cans, as called for.
I don't even run 87 in the loaner vehicles from MB or BMW when either of mine are in for recalls or warranty work, or rental vehicles for that matter.
I do the same… the rental jeep said 87’s fine but 91 or 93 for best performance so it got 93. Quick land yacht, assuming the EV battery was charged.I don't even run 87 in the loaner vehicles from MB or BMW when either of mine are in for recalls or warranty work, or rental vehicles for that matter.