Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: Gary Allan
It may or may not save fuel. It will reduce the heat generated by your tc impeller spinning fluid against a stationary turbine. It will unload the engine ..but it may just spin up to soak up the same fuel when unloaded.
You are correct except for the last part. It does save fuel. It takes gas to create that heat dissipated in the torque converter.
I have begun doing this and my MPGs have gone up about about 2mpg for my city driving. I went from 29mpg to 31mpg. For my car, though, it idles at the same RPM whether in D or N, but in N, it isn't fighting the torque converter.
Sure it will work, but now you are cycling the transmission much more than normal so your MPT (miles per transmission) will go way down. SO how far do you have to drive getting an extra 2 mpg to make up for the cost of a new trans. Reminds me of my neighbor who bought a Lexus RX400 Hybrid and paid $9,000 more tha I did with my RX330 for the same vehicle. He has to drive an additional 51,750 miles to break even with my fuel cost for the cost of his "hybrid". Then at 100-150k he has to pay an addiional $7,000 for a new battery pack.Which is an additional 41,000 miles to break even on that one.
So if you are getting 31mpg and gas costs $4.00/gal it is costing you $.13 per mile for fuel. You are saving $.26 per gallon by shifting into neutral and back to drive. Assuming a transmission rebuild/repair is $3,000. You need to get about 23,000 miles MORE than the average life of an average transmission in you vehicle model to break even by doing this shifting ordeal.
Just a thought...