Originally Posted By: MarkC
Originally Posted By: tonycarguy
I don't see how 79% APR is corporate greed. Have you guys ever worked with perpetual deadbeats? These are the people with ficos in the sub 600 range. They have no sense of money management or morality. They will stiff you and disappear any chance they get.
If you don't believe me, why don't you lend money to them at 10% with no collateral, and we'll see how quickly you change your tune.
Pointing out the alleged stupidity, laziness, whatever of one party does not excuse the extreme greed of the other party.
Nor does it get the first party off the hook for its stupidity, laziness, whatever.
The references to crack dealers/addicts made throughout this thread (not by you) are very appropriate, but not for the reason people think. It may give a "warm/fuzzy" to blame the dealer, but the bottom line is that no one held a gun to the addict's head to take that first hit, whether it be the drug, or the loan that the deep-down, the person knew they didn't qualify for, so as un-PC as it may make me out to be, yes, I do blame the addict.
As I'm not going to convince the "we're all to blame" crowd, and they're not going to convince me, this will be my last post on this topic. I don't dig death-spirals.
Originally Posted By: tonycarguy
I don't see how 79% APR is corporate greed. Have you guys ever worked with perpetual deadbeats? These are the people with ficos in the sub 600 range. They have no sense of money management or morality. They will stiff you and disappear any chance they get.
If you don't believe me, why don't you lend money to them at 10% with no collateral, and we'll see how quickly you change your tune.
Pointing out the alleged stupidity, laziness, whatever of one party does not excuse the extreme greed of the other party.
Nor does it get the first party off the hook for its stupidity, laziness, whatever.
The references to crack dealers/addicts made throughout this thread (not by you) are very appropriate, but not for the reason people think. It may give a "warm/fuzzy" to blame the dealer, but the bottom line is that no one held a gun to the addict's head to take that first hit, whether it be the drug, or the loan that the deep-down, the person knew they didn't qualify for, so as un-PC as it may make me out to be, yes, I do blame the addict.
As I'm not going to convince the "we're all to blame" crowd, and they're not going to convince me, this will be my last post on this topic. I don't dig death-spirals.