No they dont. HK uses SK Industries.LG supplies the batteries, could be an issue on their side
Its far, far worse that its ever been. The push to get designs out the door is higher pressure than it was even 10 years ago. Corners get cut everywhere, bugs are set aside in hopes there not discovered until there is an actual fix for them.That is always true. You can test test and test some more. You do the best you can, but until it hits the public, it is not tested.
I used to write business application software for a billion dollar company. You never know until it hits the road.
But your point is well taken; the better testing you do prior to release, the better your product will be.
I got rechargeable AA's for $5.22 per 4 (kids' toys have an insatiable appetite). Recognizing this was a super deal, I ordered qty 3.My system shows MSRP @ $37,655. Either way, you could buy an endless supply of AA's for that lol
So given the battery costs are well documented - and I am using the likely real cost which would be maybe under $15K manufacturing cost = that device needs to be protected.2 things wrong with this picture, not protecting critical equipment better and the extremely high cost of repair/replacement. Hitting debris on the road happens as does driving over a curb. Neither should result in a totaled new vehicle.
Bingo. This isn't some fundamental EV problem, this is an HK specific problem. The fact that the default response by both dealerships was "you need a new $42,000CDN battery that's worth more than the car" is a serious issue. I kind of expect this stuff from Tesla, they've made their batteries structural and have been quite upfront about them not being serviceable/modular. However, other marques have made it a point to talk about how individual modules and components can be replaced and it was easy for me to find examples of BMW going exactly that route with an i4, which is what we should expect to see.The Hundy owner/defenders seem to be missing the point that underbody damage that would result in a repair of some sort then drive on has caused 2 different hundy dealers on opposite sides of Canada to determine the battery is compromised and needs replacement and the extremely high cost of the battery, documented, is causing the vehicle to be declared totaled. The damage photos I’ve seen could result in anything from no repairs needed if the floorpan was dented to engine failure if the oil pan was punctured on an ICE vehicle. Unlikely an engine replacement will total a new vehicle.
2 things wrong with this picture, not protecting critical equipment better and the extremely high cost of repair/replacement. Hitting debris on the road happens as does driving over a curb. Neither should result in a totaled new vehicle.
Ive seen one or two ev6 on the forums with ouncturee coolijg in the past 2 years. It wasnt a little scratch, or iffy, or the car still driving.I would like to know just how serious this "scratch" was. Nothing seems to add up to me. And I sure as heck don't believe Internet sensationalism. But who knows? I sure don't and I tend to be a skeptic. Did something happen? Sure looks like it. The quality assurance analytics folks speak of "chronics and sames".
I have no idea how many of these cars are on the road and/or how many of these damages have occurred.
Time will tell how these cars work out. If it really is an engineering defect, perhaps Hyundai will take a lesson.
I did read Hyundai offered the owner a discount on a new vehicle, but once bitten twice shy, as they say.
Bingo!!Hyundai is just chasing subsidies like the rest of the companies and the fony green dream. If anyone is to blame it is the people who buy them.
Figured you'd come up with something even if you had to go back over 6 years to find 1 example . The guy hit a big chunk of concrete or whatever hard enough to BREAK A STRUCTURAL MEMBER OF THE FRAME. Sucks for the Corvette guy but do you really think they were similar events in the amount of destructive force transmitted to the vehicle? The underbody panel of the Hundy looks like it's made of a thin composite material of some sort, and this is supposed to protect the $42k C battery from impact? Wait, it really isn't supposed to protect the battery? So nothing really protects the battery from what the technician thought were minor impacts. And a minor dent in the actual battery case under the underbody cover will render it unusable and total the car. Got it.
I mean, someone scoured the internet to find 2 cases on an entire continent to bolster their anti-EV rhetoric...Figured you'd come up with something even if you had to go back over 6 years to find 1 example . The guy hit a big chunk of concrete or whatever hard enough to BREAK A STRUCTURAL MEMBER OF THE FRAME. Sucks for the Corvette guy but do you really think they were similar events in the amount of destructive force transmitted to the vehicle? The underbody panel of the Hundy looks like it's made of a thin composite material of some sort, and this is supposed to protect the $42k C battery from impact? Wait, it really isn't supposed to protect the battery? So nothing really protects the battery from what the technician thought were minor impacts. And a minor dent in the actual battery case under the underbody cover will render it unusable and total the car. Got it.
This is a design problem as mentioned above and if it's illustrative of how EVs are built it's a serious problem that ignores real world conditions. One could see the cost of yearly EV insurance soon totally negating any fuel savings. Then what do you have? How many would buy an EV if the all in yearly costs to operate are higher than ICE?