Originally Posted By: 3800Series
You are correct, it's been a while since I've dealt with sata 2 and was thinking it had a maximum read/write of 200. I know a 7200rpm WD Blue is rated for 140-150 read. I just looked into it tho and it appears it's a transfer limit of 300. That's about twice as fast as a HD I was thinking at best it would only be a 25% boost in speed.
Raw transfer rate is actually one of the last reasons to go SSD.
SSD has far superior latency and better durability.
Most of the slowness of spinny disks is NOT in the raw transfer speeds, it's in waiting for the drive heads to get where they need to be. SSD completely takes that out of the equation.
Every single machine that can run a modern operating system will benefit from having an SSD. Some more than others, but there's almost no circumstance where I'd take a spinny drive over an SSD. The only one is bulk storage.
You are correct, it's been a while since I've dealt with sata 2 and was thinking it had a maximum read/write of 200. I know a 7200rpm WD Blue is rated for 140-150 read. I just looked into it tho and it appears it's a transfer limit of 300. That's about twice as fast as a HD I was thinking at best it would only be a 25% boost in speed.
Raw transfer rate is actually one of the last reasons to go SSD.
SSD has far superior latency and better durability.
Most of the slowness of spinny disks is NOT in the raw transfer speeds, it's in waiting for the drive heads to get where they need to be. SSD completely takes that out of the equation.
Every single machine that can run a modern operating system will benefit from having an SSD. Some more than others, but there's almost no circumstance where I'd take a spinny drive over an SSD. The only one is bulk storage.