A tacky gear oil question

Joined
Oct 23, 2011
Messages
16
Location
NH
I'm wondering if there's a possibility that gear oil from before the '50s might have been tackier than today's oil. Here's why.

I have two antique vehicles built without transmission input shaft seals. One is a 36 Plymouth and the other is a '57 Chevrolet truck. After operating the vehicles for a period of time with oil that had been in the gearbox for years, I replaced the oil. In both cases the gearbox which did not leak while filled with "old" oil started leaking after being refilled with new oil. Both vehicles had been parked for many years prior to me getting them and the "old" oil was indeed old.

I have been working on resolving this issue for many years with the '57. I have tried multi grade oil and single grade oil. I have used recommended weight oil and higher viscosity oil up to SAE 140W I have opened up the return passage in the transmission case, switched to a sealed front bearing, and installed a NOS oil slinger. I have tried adding viscosity improver, too. Currently I leave the transmission oil level about 1" low. No matter what I've tried, the clutch and inside of the bell housing gets oil soaked. I thought the issue was with this particular transmission until I changed the "vintage" oil in the Plymouth. About two weeks after the service that transmission began leaking, too.

While pouring bar and chain oil into my saw yesterday the thought came to me that maybe some aspect of old gear oil made it tackier, and that's why the engineers could get away without installing a front seal.

Thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Interesting situation. I have a 32 Ford that the rear end has Vavoline syn gear lube in it and it doesn't leak. Maybe the newer oil and the detergents ate away old crud that was keeping the oil in?
 
Interesting situation. I have a 32 Ford that the rear end has Vavoline syn gear lube in it and it doesn't leak. Maybe the newer oil and the detergents ate away old crud that was keeping the oil in?

I thought the same thing. But if it leaks because it's clean, I think that suggests the transmissions of thousands of new vehicles would have been leaking "back in the day." The Chevrolet transmission design was updated in 54 to include an input shaft seal. The transmission in the Plymouth was updated to include an input shaft seal at some time after 1940 also.

Is there a vent on the tail shaft? If it is plugged could build pressure as it warms up,
Absolutely agree. Vents have been confirmed to be clean and clear.

I've seen a few references to GL1, a very basic oil with minimal additives, as a modern version of vintage gear oil. The quest continues...
 
I'm wondering if there's a possibility that gear oil from before the '50s might have been tackier than today's oil. Here's why.

I have two antique vehicles built without transmission input shaft seals. One is a 36 Plymouth and the other is a '57 Chevrolet truck. After operating the vehicles for a period of time with oil that had been in the gearbox for years, I replaced the oil. In both cases the gearbox which did not leak while filled with "old" oil started leaking after being refilled with new oil. Both vehicles had been parked for many years prior to me getting them and the "old" oil was indeed old.

I have been working on resolving this issue for many years with the '57. I have tried multi grade oil and single grade oil. I have used recommended weight oil and higher viscosity oil up to SAE 140W I have opened up the return passage in the transmission case, switched to a sealed front bearing, and installed a NOS oil slinger. I have tried adding viscosity improver, too. Currently I leave the transmission oil level about 1" low. No matter what I've tried, the clutch and inside of the bell housing gets oil soaked. I thought the issue was with this particular transmission until I changed the "vintage" oil in the Plymouth. About two weeks after the service that transmission began leaking, too.

While pouring bar and chain oil into my saw yesterday the thought came to me that maybe some aspect of old gear oil made it tackier, and that's why the engineers could get away without installing a front seal.

Thoughts?
I know that some of the antique Fords, (Model T & Model A and such), required 600 WT oil. This stuff to be exact. But I have no idea why. Perhaps to help prevent leakage???

I bought this stuff for other uses, (Garage door rollers and springs), and it's plenty thick.

1725976182302.jpeg
 
billt460, that's a great suggestion. I am encouraged to read "clinging" in the description of that oil. Thank you.
 
@1project2many That oil has a kinematic viscosity of 28cSt@100C and 375cSt at 40C, about an SAE 140 grade.

For those older oils mineral oil Bright Stock was used to thicken gear lubes,

https://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/30959/bright-stock-oils

Gear oils can be thickened by PIB's, mineral oil Bright Stock, high viscosity mPAO's, or a general purpose thickener such as

https://www.aftonchemical.com/Afton...ricant Components/HiTEC-7389_PDS.pdf?ext=.pdf

which provides some cling, but if you really want a clinging oil, you add a Tackifier, which is the "stickifier" for chain lubes:

https://www.chempoint.com/products/...ives/industrial-lubricant-additives/hitec-152

This is a multifunctional gear lube additive (not the only one available) many use in their gear lube formulations

https://www.aftonchemical.com/Afton...dustrial Additives/HiTEC-350_PDS.pdf?ext=.pdf
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom