You're welcome.
Nope. '56
55 turn sigs were square.
Oh yeah, '56 were square! Duh.It's a '55
Bob Falfa!Who dat?
I love the 56... From the front, the pointy grille is the telltale difference to me.Nope. '56
55 turn sigs were square.
I’m not sure that’s the original chassis. Looks like a body transplant to me. I owned a ‘57.
Curious... What don't you like? This was the way qtr mile cars were built back in the day. The light, lifted front end was for weight transfer to the rear.I had to double check this wasn't posted in the humor section. No thanks, That car looks ugly & I don't say that very often. To each their own though & if they're happy with the outcome.
Your link doesn't work for me. The car I like along with the engine but the lifted suspension just doesn't fit the car at all. Love lifted & lowered vehicles whole hearted but this lifted set up doesn't look good. No hood on it doesn't appeal either. If this is some sort of offroad drag race car, most of the time, then I understand it may need this combination & I'd agree fine but not for street cruiser appeal. Now the black two door you posted...Curious... What don't you like? This was the way qtr mile cars were built back in the day. The light, lifted front end was for weight transfer to the rear.
This photo is from the annual American Graffiti Tribute in Petaluma, CA a few years back. I will try and be there this weekend.
I agree; each to their own.
I just don't get the 58. 56 and 55 are my favorites, in that order.56 and 57 were two of my favorites. 58 was my all time favorite.