My apologies if anybody else has posted this...
http://www.infineuminsight.com/insight/nov-2016/quenching-low-speed-pre-ignition
. My executive summary;
1. Higher calcium increases LSPI
2. Magnesium is LSPI-neutral
3. Sodium in the presence of calcium increases LSPI (sorry Valvoline fans)
4. Increasing ZDDP concentration inhibits LSPI (!)
5. Antioxidants, Viscosity Modifiers, and SAE grade appear to have little to no effect upon LSPI
The finding concerning ZDDP makes dealing with DIT engines even more fun, as many people are looking to use low SAPS oils to help minimize intake valve deposits. But, increasing the ZDDP concentration can help to prevent LSPI occurrence...we're looking at a classic engineering tradeoff here!
I happened upon this article while I was trying to figure out if I should care that M1 0W30 ESP has about 1600ppm of Ca compared to roughly 1000ppm for the 5W30 version...looks like, in the particular GM engine that was used for this testing, that is possibly enough of a change to make a significant difference.
http://www.infineuminsight.com/insight/nov-2016/quenching-low-speed-pre-ignition
. My executive summary;
1. Higher calcium increases LSPI
2. Magnesium is LSPI-neutral
3. Sodium in the presence of calcium increases LSPI (sorry Valvoline fans)
4. Increasing ZDDP concentration inhibits LSPI (!)
5. Antioxidants, Viscosity Modifiers, and SAE grade appear to have little to no effect upon LSPI
The finding concerning ZDDP makes dealing with DIT engines even more fun, as many people are looking to use low SAPS oils to help minimize intake valve deposits. But, increasing the ZDDP concentration can help to prevent LSPI occurrence...we're looking at a classic engineering tradeoff here!
I happened upon this article while I was trying to figure out if I should care that M1 0W30 ESP has about 1600ppm of Ca compared to roughly 1000ppm for the 5W30 version...looks like, in the particular GM engine that was used for this testing, that is possibly enough of a change to make a significant difference.