The Mazda RX-8 is sold worldwide. It comes with a "high power" or "low power" engine option. The high power engine has more intake air flow (more ports) and is rev-limited higher than the low power engine. The low power engine is the same displacement and compression ratio as the high power engine. The peak torque is slightly higher with the low power engine.
The low power engine is used with the automatic transmission option. In every locality except North America, the high power option has one engine oil cooler used. In North America, 2 oil coolers are used. Worldwide, the low power option uses one oil cooler. In the US, Mazda specifies that 5W20 oil be used with both the low and high power engines.
Does this information provide a "data point" on the thinking of the Mazda engineers with respect to the use of 5W20 oil? Does this information show an operational limit problem which was solved to enable 5W20 to be specified with the high power engine?
Should our thinking be rather that any 5W20 problem solved with the use of an extra oil cooler would no longer exist because the Ford Spec 5W20 oil is so much better now?
The low power engine is used with the automatic transmission option. In every locality except North America, the high power option has one engine oil cooler used. In North America, 2 oil coolers are used. Worldwide, the low power option uses one oil cooler. In the US, Mazda specifies that 5W20 oil be used with both the low and high power engines.
Does this information provide a "data point" on the thinking of the Mazda engineers with respect to the use of 5W20 oil? Does this information show an operational limit problem which was solved to enable 5W20 to be specified with the high power engine?
Should our thinking be rather that any 5W20 problem solved with the use of an extra oil cooler would no longer exist because the Ford Spec 5W20 oil is so much better now?