Why I Switched to 0W8

When I see the OP's driving - and his efforts at hypermiling - I can see wanting a 0.7% increase. So, 80,000 miles/year. The 0W8 increases his MPG by 0.7%, which is roughly the equivalent of 560 miles of free driving. Given gas at $4.00+/gallon, even if he averages as much as 40 MPG he could be saving around $50. The lower the MPG, the greater the savings...so... Why not run it and try it out? The HPL product is good for an extended drain, so he would be saving operating costs there as well.

Personally, I would be driven crazy by that much exposure to Bay Area traffic, but that's a separate topic
I am 68 years old I was born in San Francisco and grew un in Millbrae and bought my first house in San Bruno and escaped the Bay Area in 2000 . The Bay Area Before is became crowded was a most incredible place to grow up.
 
If you are driving for delivery as your income source, you probably wants to deliver fast and do more jobs per hour than hypermiling to save a few bucks. If you are not hypermiling you probably shouldn't use these super low visc oil, even if it does not damage your engine the evaporation top off will waste you more money.

I would only run something the manufacturer spec, not something thinner. This likely means 0w20 or 0w16.
 
If you are driving for delivery as your income source, you probably wants to deliver fast and do more jobs per hour than hypermiling to save a few bucks. If you are not hypermiling you probably shouldn't use these super low visc oil, even if it does not damage your engine the evaporation top off will waste you more money.

I would only run something the manufacturer spec, not something thinner. This likely means 0w20 or 0w16.
I agree, I would not go any thinner than the manufacturer recommends.
 
Someone tries an oil grade that's not in the manual and gets chastised for it. Might as well shut the forum down and just put a one line statement on the front page of the site saying "Refer to your manual." :rolleyes:

I'll leave the thread now.

I personally think it's an interesting experiment. It's a custom lube from a board sponsor, worst that's going to happen is that it blows up. If he's willing to take that risk, which he seems to be fine with, then who am I to chastise him for doing so? It's not like he's being grossly misled by the membership, he took on this exercise of his own volition.

We know this isn't going to be a highly controlled experiment with tear-down testing and measurements. UOA's of course aren't going to tell us much either. The takeaway will mostly be whether it blows up or not and that's fine I think.

It'll either be spectacularly boring, or there will be some fireworks. Guess we'll see :D
 
Someone tries an oil grade that's not in the manual and gets chastised for it. Might as well shut the forum down and just put a one line statement on the front page of the site saying "Refer to your manual." :rolleyes:

I'll leave the thread now.



Don't leave the thread....

I really appreciate your great insights, knowledge, and experience.

And I agree with you.....

How about people trying something off script ??

Nothing wrong with them doing that.


I think it's actually pretty daggone cool.
 
How about people trying something off script ??
If they didn't beat the crap out of this car at redline off the rev-limiter over and over and make the viscosity 0.1 cSt from overheating everything, it probably could go thousands of miles on WD-40 if driven like a grandma. 😄 Whats the Kinematic Viscosity of WD-40 at 150C and the HTHS viscosity? :unsure: WD-40 has a Kinematic Viscosity @ 100° F (38° C): 2.8 cSt (per manufacturer). So KV100 and HTHS might even be lower than 0W-8.

Obviously, sitting there and bouncing off the rev-limiter for 3+ minutes is going to kill it from overheating everything. It would probably blow up on much thicker oil too in that situation.

Engines can take a ton of abuse, and even though there might be some accelerated wear going on they will seem to "still run pretty good".

Video starts at the WD-40 part.

 
Last edited:
If they didn't beat the crap out of this car at redline off the rev-limiter over and over and make the viscosity 0.1 cSt from overheating everything, it probably could go thousands of miles on WD-40 if driven like a grandma. 😄 Whats the viscosity of WD-40 at 150C and the HTHS? :unsure:

Video starts at the WD-40 part.




I think a 0w8 formulated by HPL would actually have a good chance of working in a regularly driven car. It actually has additives in it.

I'm not saying everyone should go out and do this deal.

I do think it's interesting though someone is willing to give a go.

And I'm totally in favor of people having the right to run whatever they want.

It's when choices are being taken away that I have a real big issue with.
 
^^^ Of course. I posted the WD-40 video to make the point the engines will still "run pretty good" if not abused, even using lubricants so thin and not even formulated for engines if the engine isn't beat to death. I would have liked to see just how long that car would have lasted if it was driven around at no more than 2500 RPM witih low throttle loads and never over-heated. I'm sure there would be much more engine wear and it would still seem to "run pretty good" from the driver's seat.
 
That's LAT though, probably the only company that has more dye in their oil than ZDDP... and they have a lot of ZDDP.

Light oils require a different mindset when it comes to formulating. You can't just toss an SP add pack into a Yubase 4 base oil with a 24 SSI VII and call it good. Shear stability, thermal stability, and volatility have to be rock solid. The margin for error is much smaller. It takes a good bit of R&D to get reliable and repeatable results from light oils. Some companies have the ability and mindset to make that happen, others don't.

If you want to know who's doing light oils successfully, go to an NHRA race, check out the Pro Stock cars, and see what company is on the cars.
Great post !
 
So how much more expensive is this 0W-8 oil? If it cost more (and harder to get) than some more main stream 0W-16 of 0W-20 oils at say Walmart, but saves only 0.7% fuel mileage then that is another factor to add to the "savings" equation. If the 0W-8 causes more oil consumption and a quart or two needs to be added between OCIs, then that's another cost factor. So in the end, he might not actually be saving any money by using 0W-8.
what im saying. thats why i think its silly to burn a bill to catch a quarter.
 
Are these low viscosity oils ever on sale? 0W-20 can be found for cheap all the time.

I’m afraid the slight savings in gas mileage won’t make up for the added cost of the oil.
 
ZeeOSix said:

So how much more expensive is this 0W-8 oil? If it cost more (and harder to get) than some more main stream 0W-16 of 0W-20 oils at say Walmart, but saves only 0.7% fuel mileage then that is another factor to add to the "savings" equation. If the 0W-8 causes more oil consumption and a quart or two needs to be added between OCIs, then that's another cost factor. So in the end, he might not actually be saving any money by using 0W-8.
what im saying. thats why i think its silly to burn a bill to catch a quarter.
And imagine if there's more engine wear?
27.gif
We'll never know from a UOA, that's for sure. ;)
 
ZeeOSix said:

So how much more expensive is this 0W-8 oil? If it cost more (and harder to get) than some more main stream 0W-16 of 0W-20 oils at say Walmart, but saves only 0.7% fuel mileage then that is another factor to add to the "savings" equation. If the 0W-8 causes more oil consumption and a quart or two needs to be added between OCIs, then that's another cost factor. So in the end, he might not actually be saving any money by using 0W-8.

And imagine if there's more engine wear?
27.gif
We'll never know from a UOA, that's for sure. ;)
I agree. It’s an interesting experiment, thankfully not at the expense of my engine. I’m not wishing the OP bad luck by any means. I’m just not sure I see the point of their decision.
 
I agree. It’s an interesting experiment, thankfully not at the expense of my engine. I’m not wishing the OP bad luck by any means. I’m just not sure I see the point of their decision.
I enjoy reading about the experiments too, operative word, "reading." I wouldn't try it though, not in anything I care about.
 
Back
Top Bottom