Originally Posted By: CATERHAM
Originally Posted By: shDK
I drive it mostly highway with speeds between 120-140 km/h. The fuelconsumption is pretty close to what mazda says i should use.
Apparently 20 oils is not verry popular here. It is considered to much of a compromise in bennefits of the fuelconsumption rather then protecting the engine. 5-40 is officially aproved by mazda denmark.
With speeds that low you the ideal lubricant choice would be the lightest oil Mazda has spec'd for your engine; namely, a 0W-20 for year round use. Heavier 0W/5w30 or 5W-40 oil grade will not provide any greater engine protection.
So the question comes down to cost an availability.
If a 5w30 is significantly cheaper then use it; the fuel economy hit will not be significant particularly during the summer months. I would not recommend the 5W-40 grade, even if it was cheap as the 3-4% fuel economy hit over a 0W-20 should negate any cost effectiveness not to mention the other performance negatives.
"3-4% fuel economy hit"???????
Sorry: I just don't believe it. Pure speculation. Pie-in-the-sky.
Cheers!
p.s. 140 kph = 86+ mph This is some how "speeds that low"?????
Originally Posted By: shDK
I drive it mostly highway with speeds between 120-140 km/h. The fuelconsumption is pretty close to what mazda says i should use.
Apparently 20 oils is not verry popular here. It is considered to much of a compromise in bennefits of the fuelconsumption rather then protecting the engine. 5-40 is officially aproved by mazda denmark.
With speeds that low you the ideal lubricant choice would be the lightest oil Mazda has spec'd for your engine; namely, a 0W-20 for year round use. Heavier 0W/5w30 or 5W-40 oil grade will not provide any greater engine protection.
So the question comes down to cost an availability.
If a 5w30 is significantly cheaper then use it; the fuel economy hit will not be significant particularly during the summer months. I would not recommend the 5W-40 grade, even if it was cheap as the 3-4% fuel economy hit over a 0W-20 should negate any cost effectiveness not to mention the other performance negatives.
"3-4% fuel economy hit"???????
Sorry: I just don't believe it. Pure speculation. Pie-in-the-sky.
Cheers!
p.s. 140 kph = 86+ mph This is some how "speeds that low"?????
Last edited: