USA to blame, as always. We are EVIL!!!!

[motorguy222]

STSinNYC,your article above makes a great amount of sense and is very truthful.If more people thought as you,we would have less problems in our nation and world.
The sad part though,is that people don't seem to want the truth nor do they want to be responsible for what they do.As you stated,the humanist culture has pushed their philosophy on society. In doing so,I believe that it has brought about a great downfall of our nations morals and inner conscience.
In return,the moral fiber of our nation is at stake.We no longer see wrong in most things we do.We no longer have sympathy for the wrongs that are done to others.
We have become a nation,as a whole, of people that are incapable of caring about anyone but themselves.
We have become a people of "Do unto others BEFORE they do unto you.How sad this is.
We have left the true and right old paths for the "new and reprehensible ways" of the New Path,which WILL be dealt with some day.
While many may not believe in God,they will answer to him someday,whether they believe in him or not.Not believing in him,God, does not make him any less real.
The unbelief of anything doesn't make it non existent.
God IS real and WE WILL answer to HIM for our actions some day.

 

[needtoknow]

Motorguy222, I think a look at these Uganda links might put a little more realism into your strict religious position on why Uganda was a success.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A29742-2003Jul8&notFound=true

http://www.usaid.gov/press/releases/2003/uganda030313.html

http://www.overpopulation.com/articles/2002/000075.html

http://www.globalhealth.org/assets/html/smm_test_503.html

It seems that good old education along with all the other important factors, condoms included, contributed to the reduction in aids in Uganda. I wonder if the school sex education part will be transferred here to U.S. schools where religious leaders prefer ignorance. And in future you would be better to leave out the "all liberals are hedonists" crap in your posts. As for my day of reckoning before God, if there is one, I'll be glad to put my life up for review along with any so called Christian. But that's between me and God not between your beliefs and my life.

 

[XS650]

quote:

---

Originally posted by needtoknow:
As for my day of reckoning before God, if there is one, I'll be glad to put my life up for review along with any so called Christian. But that's between me and God not between your beliefs and my life.

---

Could you imagine spending eternity surrounded by fundamentalists who are convinced that their way is the only way; and that if you don't believe in their god you are going to He11?

That would be He11.

 

[motorguy222]

quote:

---

Originally posted by needtoknow:
Motorguy222, I think a look at these Uganda links might put a little more realism into your strict religious position on why Uganda was a success.
It seems that good old education along with all the other important factors, condoms included, contributed to the reduction in aids in Uganda. I wonder if the school sex education part will be transferred here to U.S. schools where religious leaders prefer ignorance. And in future you would be better to leave out the "all liberals are hedonists" crap in your posts. As for my day of reckoning before God, if there is one, I'll be glad to put my life up for review along with any so called Christian. But that's between me and God not between your beliefs and my life.

---

The just say no philosophy is not just a religious view,it is how all of us make decisions each and every day.This philosophy has in essence been around as long as man himself.We CHOOSE between one decision and another each and every day.It is our choice of what we do or do not do.The just say no idea is just a point used to emphasize that we have the option of saying no.It is really no more religious in nature than the saying of "What goes around comes around".These are two sayings that have been around for years.Are you going to condemn the what goes around saying next?
I also never said that religion was the only success in Uganda.I do however believe that it was the major role player in such.When people are told that they will be held responsible for their actions by God,some realize this as being true and their life style changes.What is wrong with this? Is it reprehensible for someone to believe in God and therefore change their life for the better? Is it so terrible to think that a person can have a life changing relationship with God? A relationship that causes them to turn from a life filled with sex and or drugs.I don't see the wrong here.
Maybe it is just that many of these people have debunked the Liberals view of "they cant control themselves" philosophy.Maybe it is that many in Uganda have shown that they ARE capable of controlling themselves.Maybe it is the fact that their life changing decision was based on the teachings of the Scripture and it makes those that are unbelievers uncomfortable because they too can see the change.
Also,when I was in high school,we had education on sex.We were told about birth control etc.
However,we were not told about it in a way that many liberals want taught.It is NOT up to a school to hand out birth control in any form.
We were not taught that "you are going to have sex,so you might as well carry protection" kind of teaching that liberals want taught.The course also did not teach that a person could not have sex,the course was more neutral in nature.This is the kind of course that should be taught in schools if any kind is taught.
I don't think that it is that Christians don't want ANY kind of sex-ed. taught,it is that they don't want sex forced on their kids.They don't want their children force fed the liberal ideology of "You are going to do it,you cant control yourself" garbage.
Christians don't want their kids being told that their is nothing wrong with pre-marital sex and to go ahead,they don't want their kids made to feel that they have to have it to be 'normal'.This is more of the liberals view of sex-ed. and it is not needed.
Also,needtoknow,I never once said the following:"all liberals are hedonists".I don't know where you got that at.
But if I did say such,would it not be my opinion? You speak yours,am I not supposed to speak mine?
Although,it does seem evident that many liberals do have this philosophy.It is evident in their views of peoples lifestyles and the world in general.
Look at the philosophy of the "If it feels good do it" slogan.Many,many people follow this,in doing so,they do whatever they want.
However,I do believe that their are good descent liberals that don't try to push their ideology on others.They don't try and keep others from stating their opinions nor do they imply that their opinions should be kept to themselves.I may not agree with a persons opinion but they have a right to speak it,just as I have the right to speak mine.

 

[Bio-T]

I think we have shown both sides, time to change subject.

Thanks