Originally Posted By: Spazdog
Originally Posted By: d00df00d
Driving at speed on a variety of terrains, some of them quite rugged, without the vehicles breaking.
And a stripped down diesel Tahoe or Expedition (or F-250 or Silverado 2500) wouldn't do that?
Not as well. The whole point of the Raptor is to do that better than pretty much any stock truck.
Originally Posted By: Spazdog
Originally Posted By: d00df00d
Would you argue that state troopers don't need reasonably powerful cars just because no one they're pursuing can outrun a radio signal?
Moot point, most of the time they are sitting still watching.
....Huh?
You said the Raptor wasn't necessary because most people making illegal border crossings can't outrun a radio. I pointed out that state troopers apparently need reasonably powerful cars even though, technically speaking, NO ONE can outrun a radio. Thus, the point that you can't outrun a radio isn't an argument against having a fast vehicle. Can't imagine which part of that you are calling "moot" -- unless it's your own argument, in which case I agree.
Originally Posted By: Spazdog
A diesel would be far better for long idle times and the Duramax makes nearly 400 hp. It will work just fine.
Too bad the rest of the truck doesn't fit the job description. If it did, and if it were priced the same as the Raptor, I'm sure that's what the Border Patrol would have picked.
Originally Posted By: Spazdog
I don't know.
I like Cobras
Will you be paying for their running costs, then? Because I'm not interested in having my tax money go to keeping a helicopter in the air in cases where a ground vehicle would have been just fine, and I'm sure quite a lot of taxpayers would agree.