Pretty much what has been said all along. Too much airplane, coupled with not enough skill. Also were the apparent ingestion of a lot of drugs that were not initially reported to the FAA.... She was basically a disaster waiting to happen.
Doctors and lawyers bought Porsche 911 turbos in the 80's and they were known as widowmakers. Are CFI's pushing students through training quicker than previously? It does seem like there have been more higher profile accidents over the last few years. I do hear complaints from old timer pilots in my eaa chapter that newer students aren't "as good as they used to be" but that could be just rise colored glasses.Seems like all CFIs that flew with her didn't have much confidence in her ability to handle any airplane, let alone the Bonanza she bought. It took her almost 190 hours to get her PPL She didn't take personal responsibility to learn the systems on her aircraft, etc.
A ground analogy would be someone who took many attempts to get a drivers license, then ran out and bought a Porsche 911 GT3.
Except that that analogy fails to capture the difference because you drive the Porsche on normal streets.Seems like all CFIs that flew with her didn't have much confidence in her ability to handle any airplane, let alone the Bonanza she bought. It took her almost 190 hours to get her PPL She didn't take personal responsibility to learn the systems on her aircraft, etc.
A ground analogy would be someone who took many attempts to get a drivers license, then ran out and bought a Porsche 911 GT3.
Not really. She owned a type of wood recovery company that turned distressed barn wood into high end flooring. And also did a lot of high end interior decorating. She was a good business woman..... Just a lousy pilot.I'm assuming she got famous and the money followed all because of youtube.
Per the toxicology report, I highlighted where/how the specimens were obtained.Perhaps someone with better knowledge in the medical profession can chime in here who knows more. But that accident completely shredded that aircraft. It augered in at over 220 MPH. The bodies had to be completely shredded as well.
That said, how can they get an accurate drug toxicology report with that much damage done to the body? Most of the parts of that airplane looked like they could pass through a basketball hoop. The bodies couldn't have been in any better condition.
How time sensitive after death is it to perform these tests? Or once death occurs, do the drugs remain suspended in the tissue?Per the toxicology report, I highlighted where/how the specimens were obtained.
View attachment 325846
Obtaining a specimen in a timely manner would be very important; the sooner, the better. However, there would be other factors such as last ingestion time, chronic use, etc. Plus, most medications are metabolized by the liver. The Buspirone was likely a daily medication. The Xanax was likely as needed. The Trazodone was likely daily as well, but could have been used specifically at bedtime to aid with sleep issues. The Zofran (ondansetron) by itself doesn’t cause impairment but can lead to a prolonged qt interval. Not something you’d want to happen while flying if it results in a cardiac arrhythmia.How time sensitive after death is it to perform these tests? Or once death occurs, do the drugs remain suspended in the tissue?
Yeah, I knew I was going to be called out for omitting the Z-axis.Except that that analogy fails to capture the difference because you drive the Porsche on normal streets.