Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Just a quick question re: getting a good sample. If a car is driven on the highway for lets say 30 minutes then shut down wouldn't it be best to take the sample based on how the engine is actually used? In this example after a 30 minute drive?
Now if someone uses a car for a 1 mile trip and shuts the engine off for 8 hours then drives 1 mile home shouldn't the sample be taken after the 1 mile drive?
I'm not trying to start trouble I'm asking a question. I would want the sample to best represent how the engine and oil are being used.
No false readings, if the guy making the 1 mile trip decides to run his engine longer getting the oil to operating temps would get a report that might not be as accurate based on how he uses the car. JMO
The oil in the second report would be loaded with contaminants, and probably get a lousy report.
However that report would accurately represent the condition of the oil under actual use.
I was thinking the exact same thing.
Originally Posted By: DieselTech
The problem with a 1 minute drive and not knowing someones driving habits it there could be condensation in the sample.
Getting the oil to temp with a good drive will burn off the condensation. If the vehicle has a habit of short trips it could have excessive fuel in the sample aswell. You want this stuff burned off before you sample
Actually, I think I would want it in there to show up on the report. Which is better for someone who does a lot of short trips:
1) A report based on a sample with condensation/fuel burned off so it (falsely) looks ok to extend your OCI or...
2) An accurate report based on what your oil condition normally is, and therefor, may recommend changing your oil more frequently.
As someone who does mostly short trips myself, I would want the latter, as opposed to the former.