The VAG 1.6 and 2.0 TDI that uses an oil pump belt has no known issues.
This may be because diesel fuel is less damaging to the belt than gas.
This may be because diesel fuel is less damaging to the belt than gas.
Where are you getting the idea that the oil pump siezed? If anything, there's less load on the oil pump because it's not pumping oil. Not only that, even with no oil to pump, there will still be residual oil film in the pump to keep it lubed. As seen in the video, the oil pump spun freely. By the time it becomes a problem for the oil pump, the engine will have spun bearings and destroyed itself.This very topic was discussed at length in another thread.
The 2.7 engine which was torn down had suffered a major oil loss and the engine ran dry. It means the bathed-oil belt also ran dry (no cooling) as the engine got WAY too hot. And also the belt had an extreme load as the oil pump likely seized up, or at least suffered immense drag. That the oil pump belt looked that "bad" in the video is NOT indicative of a properly cared for engine. That belt could have lasted a LOT longer if the engine didn't run out of oil. So my point is that it's not fair to look at the belt and condemn it's condition because the condition wasn't "normal". The belt didn't cause the engine failure; the belt was a victim of the failure.
The pump may not have seized; it may have just had a large load from increased drag. It's not designed to run with no oil in it, and that's going to lead to increased friction and drag and damage. Your comment of having less drag would be true for a very short period of time, and then the frictional increase from having no lube would exacerbate the issue well past "normal" pumping resistance.Where are you getting the idea that the oil pump siezed? If anything, there's less load on the oil pump because it's not pumping oil. Not only that, even with no oil to pump, there will still be residual oil film in the pump to keep it lubed. As seen in the video, the oil pump spun freely. By the time it becomes a problem for the oil pump, the engine will have spun bearings and destroyed itself.
Lifetime wet drive belt? Not on Ford's 1.0 ecoboost, it's a 150k maintenance item.
Do we have any of the OEM’s indicating that they designed for 300k lifespan? I’m of the opinion that, unless if it’s heavy duty equipment, that they never have. I’ve heard of the 10yr/150k mark a few times over the last decade, and I believe it, but I think all the prior cars that were able to troop well past it, regardless of designed service life, were part owner’s diligence and part good luck.When Volkswagen testified at the Dieselgate hearing's they said that manufacturers considered 150k miles the lifespan of engines. So, I imagine the engineers keep this number in mind when designing. The days when products are over-engineered is long gone.
When wasn’t it? People have been buying and junking cars in all decades. And OEM’s have been constantly redesigning to reduce costs the entire time—and quite happy when a repeat buyer comes back in a short period of time. Cars are lasting longer than ever. While we can point to examples that aren’t (like this belt in oil fiasco), there’s plenty doing quite well. Average age and mileage on a car is higher than ever before.The way I see it is all automotive and other general public owned engines nowadays are disposable junk.
So many corners are being cut in the design and manufacturing process.
This number was used for the finding of extended warranty on diesel cars VW repaired/reprogrammed/sold/resold. It is available in the thousands of pages of transcriptions. You can find it online with a google search. I bought two VW's in spring of 2017. They were both brand new. The regular inherent warranty was extended to include a 12 years and 162,000 mile, zero deductible warranty for a plethora of components that had any effect on emissions, even tangentially. It also included three program changes along with a couple hardware changes. I have had two software and the first hardware change done on one vehicle. The other vehicle only has the one initial software update. The final hardware change includes replacing the DPF system but is only needed when the original system shows at least 50% lifetime persistent ash load. Both my vehicles are still in the single digits for this number. You can see where the judge extended the manufacturers assertion of its 10/150 claim to 12/162.Do we have any of the OEM’s indicating that they designed for 300k lifespan? I’m of the opinion that, unless if it’s heavy duty equipment, that they never have. I’ve heard of the 10yr/150k mark a few times over the last decade, and I believe it, but I think all the prior cars that were able to troop well past it, regardless of designed service life, were part owner’s diligence and part good luck.
Just because it was “designed” for a 10yr/150k lifespan doesn’t mean it was designed to fail at 11yr/151k. Just that 90% will make that mark (with that 90% being pulled out of the air, it may have been 75%, 99%, take your pick—with some definition of what “making it” means—no trans rebuilds but a set of wheel bearings is ok? 1 out of 1000 needed an alternator? that sort of metric).
When wasn’t it? People have been buying and junking cars in all decades. And OEM’s have been constantly redesigning to reduce costs the entire time—and quite happy when a repeat buyer comes back in a short period of time. Cars are lasting longer than ever. While we can point to examples that aren’t (like this belt in oil fiasco), there’s plenty doing quite well. Average age and mileage on a car is higher than ever before.
We’re miffed because it seems more costly than ever to buy a new car, it sure is more expensive to buy a used one, repair costs are exploding, aftermarket parts are junk and no end to the supply chain woes nor to finding qualified technicians to do the work. And systems that used to be easy to understand by a layperson (“this cable pulls on this lever, which then moves this cog… oh I see why it’s not working”) have become more complicated and require more background training, and thus peeve us all the more.
Pointing to small block V8’s with their cylinder bores that could be bored out ignores the fact that they often required that to be done within short order, and that this reflected cost control in their own day—heavy duty trucks have been using replaceable cylinder liners for quite some time, allowing for “easy” in frame rebuilds.
When the correct materials were used.When wasn’t it?
Pointing to small block V8’s with their cylinder bores that could be bored out ignores the fact that they often required that to be done within short order, and that this reflected cost control in their own day—heavy duty trucks have been using replaceable cylinder liners for quite some time, allowing for “easy” in frame rebuilds.