Method 1 - Divide by the reduction factor (64) cubedI get 0.00249 cu-in by doing it two different ways. 64 times less.
One way is (2 x 327)/(64^3), and the other way is doing it 1/64th bore area times 1/64th stroke times 16 cylinders.
64^3 = 262 144
654/262 144 = 0.00249
*******
Method 2 - Conventional displacement calculation using scaled values
((4/64)/2)^2 * π * 3.25/64 * 16 = 0.00249
You're absolutely right - I was out by a factor of 64. I think I forgot to divide the stroke by 64, meaning I had accidentally designed a very undersquare engine.
