I know very little about air filters but considering that it wasn’t run in a high dust environment (clearly, as the top of the filter is so clean and my air box appears to be sealed up well) wouldn’t we expect better filtering efficiency? It almost seems like the top and the bottom have the same amount of dirt.There is some concentration in the creases but it doesn't look bad at all. I'd knock it out or blow it off and throw it back on halfway through 20k or so. Blow it off at 10k then change it at 20?
I don't understand. So one side of the filter is clean and the other side is dirty? That's normal. What makes you say that dirt is getting through the filter then? Do you have pictures of the clean side of the filter to compare?The top side of the filter looks pretty clean, (all photos are of the bottom) but I was expecting less dust to make it through the filter, the underside of every pleat is pretty dirty.
I only posted pictures of the bottom side, which is supposed to be the clean filtered side, but it seems like a lot of dust got through. I’ll post pictures of the top intake side when I get a chance, though it’s somewhat irrelevant to my question.I don't understand. So one side of the filter is clean and the other side is dirty? That's normal. What makes you say that dirt is getting through the filter then? Do you have pictures of the clean side of the filter to compare?
As long as the clean side of the air box isn't dusty, the filter was doing a decent job.
With how clean that filter is at 13k miles, I'd keep the new air filter in service for at least 30k, if not 50k miles. Clean air filters are much less efficient than dirty filters.
Interestingly, The STP for my Volvo fit better than OEM. Find a premium filter & run it. It doesn't appear that you'll have any trouble going 20k on a decent quality filter. If you put on very low mileage then you may want to change by time instead of miles. Air filters seem to be more efficient as they load up so changing them too early may not pay off. Your posted filter still looks good at 13k.I know very little about air filters but considering that it wasn’t run in a high dust environment (clearly, as the top of the filter is so clean and my air box appears to be sealed up well) wouldn’t we expect better filtering efficiency? It almost seems like the top and the bottom have the same amount of dirt.
I replaced it with a FRAM Ultra which btw had sloppy injection molding, but was a much better fit than the STP which was borderline too big and barely fit.
3-4x the recommended AFI change for me.I run my air filters about twice as long as the owner's manual specifies. Air filters do a better job as they collect dirt. This way my engine is in better shape and I've saved time and money. Drives the same before and after the filter is changed.
Maybe you're right. They look perfectly good at twice the recommend change interval.3-4x the recommended AFI change for me.
2004 Dodge Dakota 3.7What car/engine do you have? If the bottom is duty and top is clean, then it draws from the top.
I'm not familiar with that air filter specifically but the youtube vid shows that the air tube is on top (but I'm not sure it it is the same engine as yours). If that is the same as yours, the top should be the clean side.2004 Dodge Dakota 3.7