Should have listened...synth made NO difference!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Friction and wear are very different things. Not seeing better MPG doesn't mean it's not better for the engine. The proof is out there for the viewing. If you don't plan on keeping the car past 100K miles, use conventional.
 
Originally Posted By: glum
If you don't plan on keeping the car past 100K miles, use conventional.


So what happens at the 100k mark if you use conventional oil? Not sure what you're saying, many cars have gone 200k + on conventional oils.
 
Originally Posted By: glum
Friction and wear are very different things. Not seeing better MPG doesn't mean it's not better for the engine. The proof is out there for the viewing. If you don't plan on keeping the car past 100K miles, use conventional.


crackmeup2.gif


I guess I'd better tell my 200k, 300k and almost 400k motors which saw conventional oil that they should be worn out...

You need to spend more time READING this site for the "proof" that shows conventional oils are fine for how ever long you want to keep the vehicle running. And the engine will be just fine.

Bill
 
Originally Posted By: flinter
My driving in NOT city and NOT highway. its mostly driving in
the suburbs of central NJ. 9 miles on way to work with really no
traffic to speak of and average stop and go at 3 lights.

RARELY do I drive on highways and interstates, maybe 2 , 3 times
a month. I am a VERY easy, conservative driver with a feather touch on brake ans accelerator.

With 39,700 miles, I still have about 15, 000 miles on life left
on the front pads.



Brother, your the only Jersey driver I know like this then!
48.gif
J/K
 
Originally Posted By: Bill in Utah
Originally Posted By: glum
Friction and wear are very different things. Not seeing better MPG doesn't mean it's not better for the engine. The proof is out there for the viewing. If you don't plan on keeping the car past 100K miles, use conventional.


crackmeup2.gif


I guess I'd better tell my 200k, 300k and almost 400k motors which saw conventional oil that they should be worn out...

You need to spend more time READING this site for the "proof" that shows conventional oils are fine for how ever long you want to keep the vehicle running. And the engine will be just fine.

Bill




That`s a pretty silly statement!
 
Originally Posted By: lexus114
Originally Posted By: Bill in Utah
Originally Posted By: glum
Friction and wear are very different things. Not seeing better MPG doesn't mean it's not better for the engine. The proof is out there for the viewing. If you don't plan on keeping the car past 100K miles, use conventional.


crackmeup2.gif


I guess I'd better tell my 200k, 300k and almost 400k motors which saw conventional oil that they should be worn out...

You need to spend more time READING this site for the "proof" that shows conventional oils are fine for how ever long you want to keep the vehicle running. And the engine will be just fine.

Bill




That`s a pretty silly statement!


Which one? (I'd guess the one you highlighted?)
21.gif
 
Originally Posted By: Bill in Utah
Originally Posted By: lexus114
Originally Posted By: Bill in Utah
Originally Posted By: glum
Friction and wear are very different things. Not seeing better MPG doesn't mean it's not better for the engine. The proof is out there for the viewing. If you don't plan on keeping the car past 100K miles, use conventional.


crackmeup2.gif


I guess I'd better tell my 200k, 300k and almost 400k motors which saw conventional oil that they should be worn out...

You need to spend more time READING this site for the "proof" that shows conventional oils are fine for how ever long you want to keep the vehicle running. And the engine will be just fine.

Bill




That`s a pretty silly statement!


Which one? (I'd guess the one you highlighted?)
21.gif




Yep, the one I highlighted in red.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom