Originally Posted By: JonfromCB
A quick study of the VVEL design/
acatuator motor and lift mechanisms will show you why...
It's operated by oil pressure
Maybe your study of the VVEL system was too quick- it is NOT a hydraulic system. In other words, it is not operated by oil pressure. The control shaft which determines the net displacement of the output cam (and therefore valve lift) is operated by an electric motor. If you have studied the VVEL system then you might have noticed that the system uses a drive shaft and eccentric cam to essentially "bump" the input rocker arm on the control shaft. This eccentric cam lobe must rotate inside a link which connects it to the rocker arm, in much the same way a crankshaft throw will rotate inside the big end of a connecting rod. In the latter's case, there is a hydrodynamic bearing, in the VVEL's case there is no such bearing. Thus, the eccentric cam must rotate inside the link at rpm speed relying on boundary lubrication. That might be a reason the 3.7 shears worse than previous VQ engines. In any case, it is not operated by oil pressure.
For what it's worth, the CVCC system (nissan's cam phasing) is hydraulic on the intake side only, and is employed in a common fashion seen on many other Nissan engines besides the latest 3.7. It would be a stretch to think it suddenly presents a lubrication issue in the new VE engine.
Originally Posted By: JonfromCB
and it simply generates high heat
very quickly whenever the throttle gets openened up.
Maybe you meant to say "whenever the intake valves open", since the two throttle bodies on the VE engine are a redundant safety measure and do not actually regulate the intake flow of air. Yes, I imagine from the process I described above, that the system does generate a good bit of heat over the more common cam-on-bucket design.
Originally Posted By: JonfromCB
Many oils "avoid" the Nissan DLC (plasma) coated parts
Maybe many oils are just anti-social? Seriously, though, where did this little nugget of info come from? Nissan's own pin-on-disk testing of it's H-free DLC (a-C) coating shows reduced friction over other surface treatments using a variety of engine oil formulations without issue. a-C doesn't "repel" oil, if that's what you meant to say. In fact, Nissan's own white paper found the best performance with its a-C coatings to be a PAO base oil with 1% GMO, which reduced friction "by as much as 75% compared with the result seen for a conventional 5w30 GF-4 engine oil."
I can't believe how many people think that Nissan's a-C coating require a special oil. No one with a VQ35HR needed a special oil, and that was the first Nissan engine to use a-C coated valvetrain parts. You'd think if there was an issue it would have shown up with the first generation of users. But really the fact that Nissan's own studies supports the use of any GF-4 oil to be a benefit with their coating, and a PAO (a fully saturated hydrocarbon mind you, so forget polarity) to perform the best, debunks the whole "a-C coatings need super special oil" myth.
And H-free DLC is NOT a plasma coating. Not even close. Maybe you were confusing it with the plasma coated cylinder liners found only in the GT-R's VQ38?
Originally Posted By: JonfromCB
Because true ester will seek heat, higher
ester content oils perform best in these engines...but it 'll cost ya.
Really, true esters seek heat? I wonder, what qualifies as a fake ester, and do they seek the cold? Again, where did this info come from, because there are a lot of interesting behaviors which fluids can exhibit when interacting with varying temperatures, but actively "seeking" out heat is a new one for me. And again, what constitutes a "true" ester? That's like asking which oils are "true" synthetics or "true PAO" when the only thing that actually qualifies is the base oil itself. Now, I'll give you this: there are a number of polar compounds which can be used in an engine lubricant which assists in creating a zero-pressure film which aids in start-up and "dry" lubrication times, aka when there is no oil pressure lubricating a surface or bearing. For parts in the VVEL system which have no pressurized oil supply or bearings (see above note on the eccentric cam),this can be a benefit, and is probably why Nissan came out with it's own "ester oil". Per another Nissan white paper on the subject, adequate oil film can be maintained for short dry periods with a conventional oil fortified with no more than 5% by weight of TMP ester (common POE). Sounds a lot like the infamous special Nissan oil issued to VHR engine owners.
VVEL is new, and pretty cool in purpose and design. It uses fewer parts and has less reciprocating mass than BMW's Valvetronic, which allows a higher rpm and greater potential valve lift. However, the lubrication demands are unique and I suspect the design is the reason these engines will be hard on oils compared to other contemporary valvetrains. The a-C coatings are not the problem, and the need for special Nissan oil is especially dubious when so many oils use esters or other polar compounds as part of their formula, and sell for less. Also, the mechanical shear which the oil will be subject to via the VVEL mechanism suggests to me that oil formulation is not as paramount in one's selection criteria as is choosing a suitable drain interval.
My $.02 on what is quickly becoming an infamous engine for BITOGers.
Will