Recent article on solid lubricants. Mos2 and other

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Nov 11, 2010
Messages
9,774
Location
Saskatoon canada
When to Use Solid-film Lubricants

Noria Corporation
When should solid lubricants be used and what are their advantages?

A variety of solid materials with inherent lubricating capability are available for use in solid‑film lubricants. The most commonly used are molybdenum disulfide, graphite and polytetrafluoroethylene. While these are the most common, you also may see such materials as tungsten disulfide, boron nitride, lead oxide, antimony oxide, lead, tin, silver, fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP), perfluoroalkoxy copolymer (PFA), etc.

No one formulation can satisfy all of the requirements on a cost‑effective basis. Properties that should be considered are coefficient of friction, load‑carrying capacity, corrosion resistance (susceptibility to galvanic corrosion) and electrical conductivity. Furthermore, one must consider the environment in which the solid-film lubricant must perform.

Environmental factors include temperature, pressure, humidity, oxygen content, radiation, etc. Each of the above solid‑lubricant materials has strengths and weaknesses, and corresponding compromises must be made. Molybdenum disulfide generally has the highest load‑carrying capability with a corresponding low coefficient of friction. However, in an oxidative atmosphere in excess of 400 degrees C (750 degrees F), it begins to decompose.

Graphite has high‑temperature capability in an oxidative environment but tends to promote galvanic corrosion and will not function in high vacuum. Fluorinated polymers generally exhibit a low coefficient of friction and are aesthetically quite suitable for formulations with colored pigments. However, these fluorinated polymers cannot sustain high loading, nor do they have good radiation stability.

Solid lubricants are used primarily as extreme pressure (EP) or anti-wear type additives and are applied in one of three ways. The first and most popular application for solid lubricants, particularly molybdenum disulfide and graphite, is as an EP additive in grease formulations. The plate-like structure of these solid lubricant particles reduces friction by allowing the surfaces in motion to easily slide over each other. This application can be useful in pins and bushings.

Graphite is particularly beneficial where moisture is present. In fact, the presence of moisture is necessary to ensure graphite's full benefit as a friction reducer.

Molybdenum and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) are frequently used as anti-wear additives blended with engine oils or other lubricants. There is some controversy over the effectiveness of these solid lubricants suspended in oil, but the practical evidence seems to suggest some benefit in the reduction of friction.

Perhaps the most practical and successful method of applying solid lubricants is the bonding or impregnation of these friction modifiers onto the surface of various machine components, such as cylinder liners and piston skirts in large stationary natural gas engines. The bonded film of solid lubricant forms a sacrificial wear film on the surface of the component subjected to friction. The bonding or impregnation process can be continually repeated for most components. Critical in these applications is the method used to bond the solid films onto the surfaces to be treated.




I found this to be very interesting. Kinda dispels the assumptions many here believe.

Trajan.

This ones for you
 
Originally Posted By: mongo161
It sure does! Especially with PTFE and Moly as an additive like Tuf-Oil. Thanks for the post.


PTFE may work in some applications however there is little to no proof that it can bond to metal surfaces while floating around in motor oil.

It's akin to saying since water acts as a lubricant on my neighbors slip-n-slid it should work fine in my engine.
 
It does? Which one?

"Molybdenum and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) are frequently used as anti-wear additives blended with engine oils or other lubricants. There is some controversy over the effectiveness of these solid lubricants suspended in oil, but the practical evidence seems to suggest some benefit in the reduction of friction."

Of course it probably reduces friction. But then they give no evidence it is beneficial in an ICE nor do they give any testing data. This statement is true on its face but does not link to motor oil in any way. It could just as easily mean that it reduces friction but fouls spark plugs in 300 miles. I'm not saying that it does, but the statement they give is narrowly restricted to friction.

And I like their statement about "practical evidence". Isn't this a testing organization?

"Perhaps the most practical and successful method of applying solid lubricants is the bonding or impregnation of these friction modifiers onto the surface of various machine components, such as cylinder liners and piston skirts in large stationary natural gas engines. The bonded film of solid lubricant forms a sacrificial wear film on the surface of the component subjected to friction. The bonding or impregnation process can be continually repeated for most components. Critical in these applications is the method used to bond the solid films onto the surfaces to be treated."

Are you suggesting that they are suggesting that these compounds can be bonded via inclusion into a motor oil?

Once again we get a collection of true statements that are not linked to motor oil, yet people wish to make such a link.

Originally Posted By: Clevy
I found this to be very interesting. Kinda dispels the assumptions many here believe.


Actually it kinda supports what you wish to believe. Kinda.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top