Prius C

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: The Critic
It would be interesting to see how the C does with lead foots. OP, if you are a lead foot, don't bother with one.

I know that if I drive my Prius like a maniac, I average about 37 versus 47 on my daily commute, which is a significant difference (more so that conventional cars). Given the C's small power train, I would expect the difference to be even larger.


My wife only got 39MPG in our rental Prius. She hated the car except for the comfort.
 
Originally Posted By: The Critic

I know that if I drive my Prius like a maniac, I average about 37 versus 47 on my daily commute, which is a significant difference (more so that conventional cars). Given the C's small power train, I would expect the difference to be even larger.


I disagree--less weight to start/stop, and a smaller engine means a slower burn rate. Just a SWAG, of course; but it seems to hold true for other vehicles: big boats that do ok on highway but lousy in town, versus small cars that got the same mpg regardless of city vs highway.
 
Originally Posted By: supton
big boats that do ok on highway but lousy in town, versus small cars that got the same mpg regardless of city vs highway.


LOL, I indeed did have small cars like that that had the same MPG city/hwy. However, Prius is not like that: it has better MPG in city due to hybrid system.
 
Yeah, it is surprising how the hybrids pull that off (well, not too surprising, given the technology). I was referring to conventional vehicles; my bad in not being explicit.
 
It depends on whether you are into econobox and ultra high fuel economy. If neither then you should either pay for a bigger prius lift back or a more comfortable car with less fuel economy.

I'm into small econo box with ultra high fuel economy, and I know if I were to buy a new car right now I'll get the C for sure, or the 1st gen Insight manual with aluminum body and 3cyl engine.

It's not for everyone, and CR doesn't know much about special purpose designed cars anyways. (and bad tires like Falken Ziex 512)
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: The Critic
It would be interesting to see how the C does with lead foots. OP, if you are a lead foot, don't bother with one.

I know that if I drive my Prius like a maniac, I average about 37 versus 47 on my daily commute, which is a significant difference (more so that conventional cars). Given the C's small power train, I would expect the difference to be even larger.


and the smaller battery pack will means more of the braking power is provided by the pads than charging the battery.
 
Originally Posted By: PandaBear
Originally Posted By: The Critic
It would be interesting to see how the C does with lead foots. OP, if you are a lead foot, don't bother with one.

I know that if I drive my Prius like a maniac, I average about 37 versus 47 on my daily commute, which is a significant difference (more so that conventional cars). Given the C's small power train, I would expect the difference to be even larger.


and the smaller battery pack will means more of the braking power is provided by the pads than charging the battery.


But, C is a lighter vehicle, so it should be a wash.

The main benefit of C over regular prius would be ease of parking in urban areas.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom