Originally Posted By: fdcg27
Actually, back then it was hard to buy a better car than one built by GM.
The resale thing was directed at those who bought new cars every couple of years, which was then pretty common among the more prosperous.
The German cars of the era rusted into junk within a few years of Midwestern winters, and the Italian, British and Japanese cars of the time were even worse.
This was the era in which GM really did merit the "Mark of Execellence" they put on their cars.
The era of junk began with the 1971 Vega, and continued through the Chevette and the Citation. GM still offered some very good cars through the early 'eighties, but some real stinkers as well.
Most people were very satisfied with the American cars they bought in this era, and GM could easily have run Ford and Chrysler out of business, since GM enjoyed lower cost for any completed car of any given class than did either rival, as a result of both the verticle and horizontal integration GM then had.
My, but things did change!
I totally agree. That's how I remember seeing it even into the 80's. I don't know how some older people can have such a reversionist history. Even in the worse times of the late 70's to early 90's, the designs and cars werent bad compared to the competition, yet GM got all the criticism. Even today it goes on when there's no basis at all.
I use to have some really cool GM literature and don't know where I put it.