Originally Posted by CKN
Because-admittedly the OP is not a truck guy. And to go in to truck ownership (at a mature age) could be a potential mistake. Again-I'm a truck owner and near the OPs age. If he was going to tow a fifth wheel or something-that's a whole other perspective.
I wasn't meaning to flame anyone--I was curious what some thought was the dividing line. Eg, below 3,500 towing, CUV/SUV ok. Above 3,500lb, go classic body on frame. That sort of thing.
I like the notion of the Ridgeline but since parking isn't that much of a problem for me, it didn't seem "great". Fuelly says 18mpg for pre-2017 and 20mpg 2017 & newer. Ram with 3.6 is about 19mpg.
FWD-biased doesn't bother me; I believe there is the button to "lock" the rear in (like the RAV4 used to / does have). That's good enough for snow duty for me.
Because-admittedly the OP is not a truck guy. And to go in to truck ownership (at a mature age) could be a potential mistake. Again-I'm a truck owner and near the OPs age. If he was going to tow a fifth wheel or something-that's a whole other perspective.
I wasn't meaning to flame anyone--I was curious what some thought was the dividing line. Eg, below 3,500 towing, CUV/SUV ok. Above 3,500lb, go classic body on frame. That sort of thing.
I like the notion of the Ridgeline but since parking isn't that much of a problem for me, it didn't seem "great". Fuelly says 18mpg for pre-2017 and 20mpg 2017 & newer. Ram with 3.6 is about 19mpg.

FWD-biased doesn't bother me; I believe there is the button to "lock" the rear in (like the RAV4 used to / does have). That's good enough for snow duty for me.