Originally Posted By: GenSan
More "fantasy numbers" for you nhhemi: "I am approaching 100k miles on these tires and they still have 6/32" left. Live in Michigan so they see a variety of road conditions. Best tire I have owned in 35 years."
I could go on & on from the Toyota forums, diesel pickup forums, RV forums, etc. of owners who have gone to 100,000 miles and still report useable tread depth left on their LTX M/S2's. We all must live in our own fantasy world to have such luck.
So unless you have anything credible to offer about your experience w/ the past 2 sets of Michelin LTX MS' that you supposedly had, have a good day my friend
.
You said the tires had 12/32 new. You claim 3/32 of tread wear for 65,000 miles. That means somewhere around 195,000 miles out of your set of tires by the time they get to 3/32 and need to be replaced. Do you see where I have such a hard time with those numbers? I have NO problem with claims of 80-100K out of a set of M+S2's as they are rated to 70K and with proper care and easy driving it is possible. But alomst 200K is just unrealistic. 65K out of only 1/4 of the tread is another unrealistic claim. Sorry.
Hmm, now I haven't really owned the tires. I disagree/question the mileage you are claiming so I haven't really owned them? Is that how it works?
Ok here are the 2 trucks I owned that had the original LTX M+S on them. Both Ram 1500 Quad Cab 4WD SLT's w/ 245/70/17's. The tires were the factory tread. I had far less miles on them than you but they were worn much more....
Understand this. I am simply unable to believe 65K out of 3/32 of tread wear. Nothing more. I am not knocking the tire or saying they are bad. I would pay the extra for the tires myself if I could get that kind of mileage out of them. Just no way that happens.