Last edited:
This has become my opinion. VOA is just one piece of the puzzle, how stuff actually acts is the other.why you can't choose an oil, by looking at a VOA.
After listening to that video, I understand it a whole lot better, because I was looking at it as (for ex) well Valvoline VOA has a better additive package then Mobil 1 so it must be a better oil.. unfortunately that came a lot from listening, to Ford boss man..This has become my opinion. VOA is just one piece of the puzzle, how stuff actually acts is the other.
The crux of your misunderstanding.After listening to that video, I understand it a whole lot better, because I was looking at it as (for ex) well Valvoline VOA has a better additive package then Mobil 1 so it must be a better oil.. unfortunately that came a lot from listening, to Ford boss man..
A safe assumption considering Blackstone has noted that they see no statistically significant difference in wear numbers for any oil they have tested.Years ago I sent in a few used oil samples. Out of the oils I sent in QS gave me the best wear numbers. I didn't try PZ though. I'll assume it also would have had great numbers.
Sounds about right, for it was hundreds of years ago.Hundreds of years ago,
I was thinking the same thing!Should have ran the platinum against the ultimate protection. Both good oils
That’s right. Every oil deserves a fair trialQuaker State Ultimate Protection should be tested against Pennzoil Ultra Platinum.
Quaker State (default) Synthetic should be tested against Pennzoil (default) Platinum.
That decries opponent testing equalization.