Originally Posted By: Ducked
Coincidentally (?) this came up just recently. Shannow posted a good overview paper for diesel engines.
http://infohouse.p2ric.org/ref/31/30453.pdf
The bulk of the wear is caused by particles below 10 microns. Since there are situations (cam lobes, gears) where the parts are in boundary lubrication with zero clearance, there is no particle size too small to cause wear.
The contamination x hours graph is interesting, on page 11 of that report-if even a Purolator made Performax filter makes that much of a difference over a standard paper/cellulose filter, imagine what an Ultra, Donaldson Blue, or Fleetguard Stratapore/Nano/Venturi could do! Granted, most of us don't operate in a molybdenum ore mine...
Coincidentally (?) this came up just recently. Shannow posted a good overview paper for diesel engines.
http://infohouse.p2ric.org/ref/31/30453.pdf
The bulk of the wear is caused by particles below 10 microns. Since there are situations (cam lobes, gears) where the parts are in boundary lubrication with zero clearance, there is no particle size too small to cause wear.
The contamination x hours graph is interesting, on page 11 of that report-if even a Purolator made Performax filter makes that much of a difference over a standard paper/cellulose filter, imagine what an Ultra, Donaldson Blue, or Fleetguard Stratapore/Nano/Venturi could do! Granted, most of us don't operate in a molybdenum ore mine...