Engineering Explained goes into more detail on the rotary engine itself, quite a few improvements that make me hopeful for that future rotary sports car one day.
That may not be the case with direct injection rotary engines. The fuel/air tends to remain unburned around the edges of the rotor. By injecting fuel into the center area, this problem may be avoided.Sad, yet true. It's hard to make a Wankel engine pass emissions.
That may not be the case with direct injection rotary engines. The fuel/air tends to remain unburned around the edges of the rotor. By injecting fuel into the center area, this problem may be avoided.
I absolutely love the idea of a rotary/generator/hybrid. Maybe the upcoming Ram EV truck setup can use such a setup.
I'd like to see more than 50 miles of EV range. This is Chevy Volt territory.
Perhaps. Yet Wankel efficiency still suffers due to the shape of the combustion chamber - long and narrow with a lot of surface area. We used to say the Wankel made twice the power of a piston engine by burning 3 times the fuelThat may not be the case with direct injection rotary engines. The fuel/air tends to remain unburned around the edges of the rotor. By injecting fuel into the center area, this problem may be avoided.
...
My best friend had one, bought new when they first came out, was a cool car.I want a modern RX7.
It's a good thing Mazda has kept their engineering dept away from Ford's, maybe that's why they're at the top of their class...Mazda engineers are at the top of their class.
For those that dont know in 2012 (possibly 2011) they premiered their Skyactive engine which was and maybe still is the highest compression mass produced engine in the world that runs on regular gas.
You mean that is why Ford is not at the top of their class. Mazda ended that relationship over a decade ago.It's a good thing Mazda has kept their engineering dept away from Ford's, maybe that's why they're at the top of their class...
Hybrid has its place. Diesel-electric locomotives for example. Use an ultra efficient liquid fuel engine to power a high performance electric one. That said, Ive just gone full EV, because it makes more sense to me in my application.Yes, with our genius, we have created an electric car that burns gasoline and needs oil changes.
*Americans creating thunderous applause. Women and children weeping with joy*
Its not. My rav4 prime was 14:1, ran on 87oct. Had a higher thermal efficiency rating, too. Over 40%.Mazda engineers are at the top of their class.
For those that dont know in 2012 (possibly 2011) they premiered their Skyactive engine which was and maybe still is the highest compression mass produced engine in the world that runs on regular gas.
Its not. My rav4 prime was 14:1, ran on 87oct. Had a higher thermal efficiency rating, too. Over 40%.
I have extensive knowledge on this one as I've worked for the railroad for many years and I don't know if efficiency is really the reason. It's the electric torque for startup and durability. If there was a coupling to an actual engine, that would break immediately trying to move if not spin the wheels trying to get into the power band. Electric traction motors with wheel slip control is much easier to regulate. On a typical train that is around 15,000+ ton with 2 engines it'll use about 3,000-4,000 gallons total to go 200 miles. They'll usually add 5,000 gallons at a crew change point between the 2-3 engines which even on off-road diesel is around $17,500. Efficiency may be a driver, but I think by far durability and reliability are the the main factors.Hybrid has its place. Diesel-electric locomotives for example. Use an ultra efficient liquid fuel engine to power a high performance electric one. That said, Ive just gone full EV, because it makes more sense to me in my application.
Thanks for first hand info! Durability and power and reliability work for meI have extensive knowledge on this one as I've worked for the railroad for many years and I don't know if efficiency is really the reason. It's the electric torque for startup and durability. If there was a coupling to an actual engine, that would break immediately trying to move if not spin the wheels trying to get into the power band. Electric traction motors with wheel slip control is much easier to regulate. On a typical train that is around 15,000+ ton with 2 engines it'll use about 3,000-4,000 gallons total to go 200 miles. They'll usually add 5,000 gallons at a crew change point between the 2-3 engines which even on off-road diesel is around $17,500. Efficiency may be a driver, but I think by far durability and reliability are the the main factors.
I didn't know they divorced. That's great news! We've had two Mazdas and loved them both. I wouldn't hesitate to buy another one...You mean that is why Ford is not at the top of their class. Mazda ended that relationship over a decade ago.
They have recently teamed up with Toyota on a USA project. I always looked at Mazda as the specialty company. Not looking to take over the world but just build good, basic reliable cars with some very cutting edge engine technology.
Mazda Toyota Manufacturing Begins Production on 2022 Corolla Cross - Toyota USA Newsroom
HUNTSVILLE, Ala. (September 30, 2021) – With the push of a button and an engine roaring to life, Mazda Toyota Manufacturing (MTM) and its over 2,000 team members celebrated the start of production of the all-new 2022 Corolla Cross. MTM, the only North American facility to produce the Corolla...pressroom.toyota.com