No I don’t actually. Late springWas wondering when the new Amsoil formulation will be out. We heard last year that it would be around March 2026, but I haven’t heard anything since. Perhaps @Pablo knows?
Formulas are constantly evolving and improvingWhat are they changing? I thought the existing formula was pretty good.
Does the “formulation” change include the base stock composition?Not exactly the best timing
Of course who knew ?
No one here posting knows.Does the “formulation” change include the base stock composition?
That's pretty obvious but the end date situation is new and may create issuesThis was announced in a newsletter last year so no connection to the current base oil situation.
I agree 100%. Just didn’t want people thinking the formula change was happening because of the current shortage.That's pretty obvious but the end date situation is new and may create issues
Valvoline Restore and Protect is a great but niche product. Plus that magic sauce is proprietaryAmsoil’s response to Valvoline Restore and Protect?
How is it a niche product? I think it should be the default API spec oil option unless something else needed.Valvoline Restore and Protect is a great but niche product. Plus that magic sauce is proprietary
you know what, I completely agree with you, it should be the default the go to option.How is it a niche product? I think it should be the default API spec oil option unless something else needed.
Probably not. As long as the interchange is in line with API Annex E then that's kind of the point, it's not a formula change. You're essentially swapping out one base stock with another that has the same physical properties and performance.If there was a change in the base stock, then wouldn't Amsoil have to change the "formula" to accomplish the same goal, with different starting materials....?
Same result, same destination.....different journey.
I would assume they have to buy base stock from one of the bigger companies......
Still will be superior product, worry not.
So, a nothing burger in other words......seemingly in this case.Probably not. As long as the interchange is in line with API Annex E then that's kind of the point, it's not a formula change. You're essentially swapping out one base stock with another that has the same physical properties and performance.
But we don't know if that's the case or not. Either way as you have noted, I would guess that the end performance is equivalent.
Could be!So, a nothing burger in other words......seemingly in this case.
Wishful Thinking!But would it be safe to say, that if enough of the base was changed, then more changes down he line might be required to end up with the same result?
Time will Tell!Am I thinking on that right?